Abstracting and Indexing

  • Google Scholar
  • CrossRef
  • WorldCat
  • ResearchGate
  • Academic Keys
  • DRJI
  • Microsoft Academic
  • Academia.edu
  • OpenAIRE

Effect of Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Respect to Tumor Size: A Prospective Observational Study

Article Information

Muhammad Sohaib Asghar1*, Sarah Kamran Akbani2, Noman Ahmed Khan3, Syed Jawad Haider Kazmi4, Mohammed Akram5, Rumael Jawed5, Maira Hassan5, Uzma Rasheed5

1Resident Physician of Internal Medicine, Dow University Hospital, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan

2Graduate of Medicine, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan

3Resident of General Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan

4Resident of Emergency Medicine, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan

5Intern of Gastroenterology, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan

*Corresponding Authors: Dr. Muhammad Sohaib Asghar, Resident Physician of Internal Medicine at Dow University Hospital, Dow University of Health Sciences, Gulshan-e-Iqbal, Karachi, Pakistan

Received: 02 August 2020; Accepted: 03 September 2020; Published: 01 October 2020

Citation: Muhammad Sohaib Asghar, Sarah Kamran Akbani, Noman Ahmed Khan, Syed Jawad Haider Kazmi, Mohammed Akram, Rumael Jawed, Maira Hassan, Uzma Rasheed. Effect of Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Respect to Tumor Size: A Prospective Observational Study. Journal of Cancer Science and Clinical Therapeutics 4 (2020): 382-392.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma is ranked as the sixth most common cancer globally. It also accounts for the second leading determinant of cancer-related mortalities worldwide. In the present day, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the treatment modality of preference for high burden hepatocellular carcinoma. Our study aims to report the efficacy of TACE and alterations in laboratory parameters in patients of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after undergoing TACE in lieu with size >3 cm or <3 cm of the tumor. This prospective observational study was prosecuted in medicine, gastroenterology and hepatology department including 167 patients who were previously diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma by radiological imaging, and have undergone TACE. The mean age of the study population is 53.89 ± 10.58 with females elder than males (p=0.038). The most frequent cause was Hepatitis C (p<0.001). Total bilirubin was found more in <3 cm tumor size (p=0.052) while decreased platelets were more a feature of >3cm tumor size (p=0.050). After TACE, bilirubin levels were remarkably improved in <3 cm tumor size, while INR and Platelets equally improved in both the groups and serum albumin and serum sodium was comparatively more improved in >3cm tumor size. Serum creatinine worsened in <3cm tumor size while improved in >3 cm tumor size, and SGPT was indifferent in <3cm tumor size and worsened in >3cm tumor size. Mean meld score was found improved in both the study groups however, greater improvements were seen in >3cm tumor size group. Downstaging of child-pugh classes was statistically significant in both the study groups (p<0.001).

 

Keywords

TACE; Child-Pugh; Hepatoma; Tumor; MELD; Severity markers

TACE articles, Child-Pugh articles, Hepatoma articles, Tumor articles, MELD articles, Severity markers articles

TACE articles TACE Research articles TACE review articles TACE PubMed articles TACE PubMed Central articles TACE 2023 articles TACE 2024 articles TACE Scopus articles TACE impact factor journals TACE Scopus journals TACE PubMed journals TACE medical journals TACE free journals TACE best journals TACE top journals TACE free medical journals TACE famous journals TACE Google Scholar indexed journals Child-Pugh articles Child-Pugh Research articles Child-Pugh review articles Child-Pugh PubMed articles Child-Pugh PubMed Central articles Child-Pugh 2023 articles Child-Pugh 2024 articles Child-Pugh Scopus articles Child-Pugh impact factor journals Child-Pugh Scopus journals Child-Pugh PubMed journals Child-Pugh medical journals Child-Pugh free journals Child-Pugh best journals Child-Pugh top journals Child-Pugh free medical journals Child-Pugh famous journals Child-Pugh Google Scholar indexed journals Hepatoma articles Hepatoma Research articles Hepatoma review articles Hepatoma PubMed articles Hepatoma PubMed Central articles Hepatoma 2023 articles Hepatoma 2024 articles Hepatoma Scopus articles Hepatoma impact factor journals Hepatoma Scopus journals Hepatoma PubMed journals Hepatoma medical journals Hepatoma free journals Hepatoma best journals Hepatoma top journals Hepatoma free medical journals Hepatoma famous journals Hepatoma Google Scholar indexed journals Tumor articles Tumor Research articles Tumor review articles Tumor PubMed articles Tumor PubMed Central articles Tumor 2023 articles Tumor 2024 articles Tumor Scopus articles Tumor impact factor journals Tumor Scopus journals Tumor PubMed journals Tumor medical journals Tumor free journals Tumor best journals Tumor top journals Tumor free medical journals Tumor famous journals Tumor Google Scholar indexed journals MELD articles MELD Research articles MELD review articles MELD PubMed articles MELD PubMed Central articles MELD 2023 articles MELD 2024 articles MELD Scopus articles MELD impact factor journals MELD Scopus journals MELD PubMed journals MELD medical journals MELD free journals MELD best journals MELD top journals MELD free medical journals MELD famous journals MELD Google Scholar indexed journals Severity markers articles Severity markers Research articles Severity markers review articles Severity markers PubMed articles Severity markers PubMed Central articles Severity markers 2023 articles Severity markers 2024 articles Severity markers Scopus articles Severity markers impact factor journals Severity markers Scopus journals Severity markers PubMed journals Severity markers medical journals Severity markers free journals Severity markers best journals Severity markers top journals Severity markers free medical journals Severity markers famous journals Severity markers Google Scholar indexed journals Hepatocellular carcinoma articles Hepatocellular carcinoma Research articles Hepatocellular carcinoma review articles Hepatocellular carcinoma PubMed articles Hepatocellular carcinoma PubMed Central articles Hepatocellular carcinoma 2023 articles Hepatocellular carcinoma 2024 articles Hepatocellular carcinoma Scopus articles Hepatocellular carcinoma impact factor journals Hepatocellular carcinoma Scopus journals Hepatocellular carcinoma PubMed journals Hepatocellular carcinoma medical journals Hepatocellular carcinoma free journals Hepatocellular carcinoma best journals Hepatocellular carcinoma top journals Hepatocellular carcinoma free medical journals Hepatocellular carcinoma famous journals Hepatocellular carcinoma Google Scholar indexed journals transarterial chemoembolization articles transarterial chemoembolization Research articles transarterial chemoembolization review articles transarterial chemoembolization PubMed articles transarterial chemoembolization PubMed Central articles transarterial chemoembolization 2023 articles transarterial chemoembolization 2024 articles transarterial chemoembolization Scopus articles transarterial chemoembolization impact factor journals transarterial chemoembolization Scopus journals transarterial chemoembolization PubMed journals transarterial chemoembolization medical journals transarterial chemoembolization free journals transarterial chemoembolization best journals transarterial chemoembolization top journals transarterial chemoembolization free medical journals transarterial chemoembolization famous journals transarterial chemoembolization Google Scholar indexed journals gastroenterology articles gastroenterology Research articles gastroenterology review articles gastroenterology PubMed articles gastroenterology PubMed Central articles gastroenterology 2023 articles gastroenterology 2024 articles gastroenterology Scopus articles gastroenterology impact factor journals gastroenterology Scopus journals gastroenterology PubMed journals gastroenterology medical journals gastroenterology free journals gastroenterology best journals gastroenterology top journals gastroenterology free medical journals gastroenterology famous journals gastroenterology Google Scholar indexed journals hepatology articles hepatology Research articles hepatology review articles hepatology PubMed articles hepatology PubMed Central articles hepatology 2023 articles hepatology 2024 articles hepatology Scopus articles hepatology impact factor journals hepatology Scopus journals hepatology PubMed journals hepatology medical journals hepatology free journals hepatology best journals hepatology top journals hepatology free medical journals hepatology famous journals hepatology Google Scholar indexed journals

Article Details

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma has a vital role in cancer incidence and mortality [1]. Occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma keeps on prevailing in many countries [2]. The approximate calculation of new cases yearly is over 500, 000 and annual occurrence is between 2.5 and 7% of patients with liver cirrhosis [2]. Hepatitis B and C are predominant risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma [3]. Hepatocellular carcinoma is ranked as the sixth most common cancer globally [4, 6]. It also accounts for the second leading determinant of cancer-related mortalities worldwide [5, 6]. The phenomenon of hepatocellular carcinoma is directly in correspondence with age, regardless of the fact, in the endemic areas of viral hepatitis, it might present in adolescents [7]. Hepatocellular carcinoma depicts gender prevalence for males, who are distressed in comparison to females, although this predominance is credited due to excessive exposure of men to prime risk factors [7]. The number of new cases that have been speculated is 564, 000 comprising of 398, 000 of men and 166, 000 in women [8]. The endemic areas at potential risk are located in Eastern Asia, Middle Africa, and some countries of Western Africa [8]. The predisposing and relative factors of hepatocellular carcinoma other than chronic liver disease, hepatitis B, and C are heavy alcohol consumption, Aflatoxin exposure, cigarette smoking, iron overload, use of oral contraceptives, and anabolic steroids [9]. There is diversity in the display of hepatocellular carcinoma, asymptomatic throughout its proceeding stages usually masking the early detection of cancer [6]. The marked salient features of hepatocellular carcinoma are abdominal pain (53%), mass (34%), and ascites (20%) [10]. The majority of sufferers suffer from common associated features that are cirrhosis (63%) and hepatitis surface antigen (HbsAg) (52%) [10]. Patients of hepatocellular carcinoma encountering paraneoplastic syndromes commonly have bulky tumor volume and elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein [11]. Paraneoplastic syndromes manifest as hypercholesterolemia, hypoglycemia, hypercalcemia, and erythrocytosis [11]. The crucial complications of hepatocellular carcinoma are due to its affliction towards vessels leading to thrombotic events presenting as upper gastrointestinal bleed, esophageal varices, and portal vein thrombosis [12]. Other complications worsening the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma are hepatic encephalopathy and ascites [12].

Hepatocellular carcinoma due to its late diagnosis and masking of symptoms significantly alter liver function tests as claimed by statistical data analysis [13]. This hindrance in the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma leads to a diminished response to systemic chemotherapy [14]. This is higher incidence of undetected hepatocellular carcinoma nullify patients from opting curative treatment [14]. To enhance survival rates in the patients of hepatocellular carcinoma, multiple treatment modalities are available categorized in the surgical and non-surgical categories according to the severity of the disease [14]. Surgical modalities opted for eliminating hepatocellular carcinoma are Surgical resection (SR), Percutaneous ablative therapy by radiofrequency (RFA), Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), and Liver transplant (LT). Other modalities are contemplated as palliative therapies, comprising of Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and radioembolization for intermediate stages, systemic therapy in the form of Sorafenib for late stages [15]. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a manifestation of intraarterial catheter dependent chemotherapy that specifically imparts high dosages of cytotoxic medications to neoplasm collaborating with the impact of ischemic necrosis generated by arterial embolization [16]. Transarterial chemoembolization is an invasive procedure, was pioneered by Dr. Sven-Iver Seldinger in 1953, A Swedish radiologist native of Mora Municipality, Dalarna County [17]. Transarterial chemoembolization secondly called radioembolization or targeted internal radiation therapy, comprising of targeted intraarterial administration of microspheres laden with radioactive compounds mostly Yttrium or Lipiodol tagged with iodine or rhenium, through a percutaneous approach [18]. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is executed by injection of single or numerous chemotherapeutic medications following catheterization of neoplasm loaded arteries, amalgamed by embolization of similar arteries in place of acquiring enhancing impact of cytotoxicity and ischemia [19].

Transarterial chemoembolization encompasses two methodologies since 2004, which is Conventional TACE (cTACE) and TACE with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) [20, 21]. Conventional TACE (cTACE) favors transcatheter carriage of chemotherapeutic drugs using Lipodol mediated colloid along with an embolizing drug to gain significant effects of ischemia and cytotoxicity [20-23]. TACE with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) procedure permits the therapy to be transported directly into the liver by the fusion of minuscule beads with chemotherapy agent Doxorubicin conveyed to neoplasm through the arterial catheter [20, 21, 24, 25]. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is opted for patients at stage B with intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma as quoted by one of the persistently sought criteria for staging Hepatocellular carcinoma, that is, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) using factors comprising of tumor staging, liver function status, physical status, functional status, and cancer-associated symptoms [26]. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a commodity availed for patients standing at the score of Child Pugh's B and Child Pugh's C as quoted by the most sought classification of the staging of liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma known as "Child Pugh’s" which is based on five stipulations: 1) Albumin levels, 2) Prothrombin time/International Nationalization Ratio, 3) Ascites, 4) Encephalopathy and 5) Bilirubin levels [27].

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been recommended for ages as the criterion conventional for palliative treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and has been outlined to boost the 5 years survival rates in contrast with supportive therapy [28-31]. As proposed by Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC), Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is prioritized as the first-line treatment for unresectable intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (stage B) [28-31]. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a guarded and controlled mechanism but there are countable heinous complications associated, the ones reported are Tumor rupture, Liver abscess, bile leak, Hepatic failure, Gastrointestinal hemorrhage/ulceration, and Pulmonary embolism [32-34]. Approximate contraindications to the employment of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) include contrast allergy, renal impairment, coagulopathy, cardiac dysfunction [35, 36]. Irrevocable contraindications to the usage of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) include acute derangement of baseline liver functions, anaphylactic reactions to iodinated contrast, portal vein thrombosis, and infiltration due to extrahepatic metastasis [35, 36]. The aim of this study is to trail the downstaging of tumor from Child Pugh's B and C to Child Pugh's A and B by beneficial effects of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), to evaluate the role of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in maintaining the model for end-stage liver disease score (MELD) below 15 to avoid liver transplantation. The secondary objectives were to determine whether the improvement of the severity of the liver disease is seen greater in tumor size >3cm or <3cm.

2. Materials and Methods

This prospective observational study was prosecuted in medicine, gastroenterology and hepatology department at DOW University Hospital, one of the prestigious and top-notch hospitals imparting health care facilities to the patients paying a visit to the hospital institution. After inclusions and exclusions of terminologies, we finalized the proforma which is split into two sections, the first section comprises demographic data containing the name (optional), age, gender, and any comorbidities currently suffered (apart from hepatoma). The second section is additionally split into a few sub-categories including parameters of Child Pugh's score, that is, the Patient's laboratory parameters before and after TACE. All the findings after investigating the parameters mentioned above will be captivated on inclusion as baseline findings before undergoing the process of TACE. Any dramatic or remote changes in findings during and after the process of TACE will be recorded. All the patients who are previously diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma by radiological imaging were part of our study, and have undergone TACE, while those who died during the study period were omitted from the study. The sample size of 169 was enumerated by using 5% as a margin of error, 95% as a confidence interval, 100 as population size, and 50% as response distribution. Two patients during the study period had opted for liver transplantation, hence omitted from the final results, hence a final sample size of 167 patients was collected through non-probability consecutive methods. All the data was then assembled, entered, and analyzed using SPSS 25.0 software version, and outcomes were obtained respectively.

3. Results

The mean age of the study population is 53.89 ± 10.58 with females elder than males (p=0.038). The two study groups were comparable with age, gender, and comorbidities as shown in Table 1. The most frequent cause was Hepatitis C (p<0.001). The child pugh’s classification was also comparable amongst the two study groups. Total bilirubin was found more in <3 cm tumor size (p=0.052) while decreased platelets were more a feature of >3cm tumor size (p=0.050). The rest baseline labs were comparable in both study groups as shown in Table 2. Table 3 has shown a follow up of comparative labs after TACE in both the study groups. Almost all the laboratory investigations and determinants of child pugh’s scoring shown improvement post TACE procedure. Notably, bilirubin levels were remarkably improved in <3cm tumor size, while INR and Platelets equally improved in both the groups and serum albumin and serum sodium were comparatively more improved in >3cm tumor size. Serum creatinine worsened in <3cm tumor size while improved in >3 cm tumor size, and SGPT was indifferent in <3 cm tumor size and worsened in >3cm tumor size. Mean meld score was found improved in both the study groups however, greater improvements were seen in >3cm tumor size group. Before the TACE procedure, the child pugh scoring of <3cm tumor size group showed the highest individuals in class C category and that of >3cm tumor size group were in the class B category. After TACE procedure, the downstaging of child class was observed greater in tumor size >3cm with one-half falling in child class A, and one-third in child class B. While, downstaging also occurred in tumor size <3cm with 46% study participants now falling in child class B and 36% in child class A. Overall, downstaging of child pugh classes was statistically significant in both the study groups (p<0.001).

Demographic data

p-value

1

Age (in years)

Age Group

<50 years

>50 years

-

Total

70 (41.9%)

97 (58.1%)

Males

42 (46.2%)

49 (53.8%)

0.225**

Females

28 (36.8%)

48 (63.2%)

Tumor size <3cm

32 (39.0%)

50 (61.0%)

0.457**

Tumor size >3cm

38 (44.7%)

47 (55.3%)

2

Mean age (in years)

53.89 ± 10.58

-

Males: 52.37 ± 11.43

Females: 55.72 ± 9.20

0.038*

Tumor size <3cm: 54.35 ± 9.48

Tumor size >3cm: 53.45 ± 11.58

0.586*

3

Gender

Males: n=91 (54.5%)

Females: n=76 (45.5%)

-

Tumor size <3cm: n=47 (57.3%)

Tumor size <3cm: n=35 (42.7%)

0.471**

Tumor size >3cm: n=44 (51.8%)

Tumor size >3cm: n=41 (48.2%)

4

Comorbidities (other than Hepatoma)

Frequency of Diseases

Tumor size <3 cm

Tumor size >3 cm

-

Abbreviations:

DM: 24.6% (n=41)

30.5% (n=25)

18.8% (n=16)

0.089^

DM: Diabetes Mellitus

HTN: 12.0% (n=20)

12.2% (n=10)

11.8% (n=10)

HTN: Hypertension

DM+HTN: 10.2% (n=17)

12.2% (n=10)

8.2% (n=7)

CKD: Chronic Kidney Disease

DM+CKD: 3.6% (n=6)

4.9% (n=4)

2.4% (n=2)

Hep B: Hepatitis B virus

HTN+CKD: 3.6% (n=6)

6.1% (n=5)

1.2% (n=1)

Hep C: Hepatitis C virus

NAFLD: Non-Alcoholic fatty

DM+HTN+CKD: 1.2% (n=2)

1.2% (n=1)

1.2% (n=1)

 

liver disease

HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma

CKD: 3.6% (n=6)

2.4% (n=2)

4.7% (n=4)

 

No comorbidities: 41.3% (n=69)

30.5% (n=25)

50.8% (n=44)

5

Known cause of HCC

Hep B: 14.4% (n=24)

2 (2.4%)

22 (25.9%)

<0.001^

Hep C: 43.1% (n=72)

9 (11.0%)

63 (74.1%)

NAFLD: 15.0% (n=25)

23 (29.1%)

2 (2.3%)

Alcohol: 4.2% (n=7)

7 (8.9%)

0 (0.0%)

No identified cause: 23.4% (n=39)

38 (48.1%)

1 (1.1%)

6

Tumor size

<3cm: n=79 (47.3%)

>3cm: n=88 (52.7%)

-

7

Child Pugh’s Class

Class A: n=11 (13.9%)

Class A: n=17 (19.3%)

0.415**

Class B: n=30 (38.0%)

Class B: n=37 (42.0%)

Class C: n=38 (48.1%)

Class C: n=34 (38.6%)

* indicates independent sample t-test, ** indicates Fisher’s exact test, *** indicates chi-square test.

Table 1: Demographic data of the study population (n=167).

#

Laboratory investigations

All patients (n=167)

Grouping variables

p-value

Tumor size <3cm (n=79)

Tumor size >3cm (n=88)

1

Total Bilirubin (mg/dl)

3.62 ± 5.48

4.49 ± 7.23

2.84 ± 3.02

0.052

2

Direct Bilirubin (mg/dl)

2.00 ± 3.24

2.48 ± 4.24

1.57 ± 1.86

0.068

3

Indirect Bilirubin (mg/dl)

1.65 ± 2.35

2.00 ± 3.07

1.33 ± 1.36

0.064

4

International normalized ratio

1.88 ± 1.77

1.98 ± 1.75

1.79 ± 1.79

0.502

5

Platelet counts (109/L)

121.87 ± 82.64

135.10 ± 83.11

110.00 ± 80.84

0.05

6

Serum Albumin (g/dl)

2.61 ± 0.69

2.58 ± 0.72

2.63 ± 0.67

0.648

7

Serum Sodium (mEq/L)

132.58 ± 6.55

132.21 ± 6.29

132.90 ± 6.80

0.496

8

Serum Creatinine (mg/dl)

1.45 ± 1.25

1.60 ± 1.61

1.33 ± 0.80

0.162

9

Alanine Transaminase (IU/L)

54.49 ± 45.42

53.56 ± 42.75

55.32 ± 47.92

0.803

10

Mean MELD score

20.35 ± 8.62

21.38 ± 8.90

19.42 ± 8.30

0.143

P-Value calculated by independant sample t-test.

Table 2: Comparison of severity markers amongst the patients of Hepatocellular carcinoma (at inclusion).

#

Laboratory investigations

Tumor size <3cm (n=79)

p-value

Tumor size >3cm (n=88)

p-value

Before TACE

After TACE

Before TACE

After TACE

1

Total Bilirubin (mg/dl)

4.49 ± 7.23

1.81 ± 2.67

0.003*

2.84 ± 3.02

1.57 ± 1.96

0.002*

2

Direct Bilirubin (mg/dl)

2.48 ± 4.24

0.93 ± 1.78

0.003*

1.57 ± 1.86

0.69 ± 1.24

<0.001*

3

Indirect Bilirubin (mg/dl)

2.00 ± 3.07

0.87 ± 0.95

0.003*

1.33 ± 1.36

0.87 ± 0.85

0.010*

4

International normalized ratio

1.98 ± 1.75

1.30 ± 0.42

0.001*

1.79 ± 1.79

1.20 ± 0.33

0.002*

5

Platelet counts (109/L)

135.10 ± 83.11

180.01±81.99

0.001*

110.00 ± 80.84

195.43 ± 80.99

<0.001*

6

Serum Albumin (g/dl)

2.58 ± 0.72

3.05 ± 0.65

<0.001*

2.63 ± 0.67

3.25 ± 0.56

<0.001*

7

Serum Sodium (mEq/L)

132.21 ± 6.29

134.50 ± 5.50

0.012*

132.90 ± 6.80

136.82 ± 4.37

<0.001*

8

Serum Creatinine (mg/dl)

1.60 ± 1.61

1.79 ± 1.51

0.420*

1.33 ± 0.80

1.20 ± 1.24

0.437*

9

Alanine Transaminase (IU/L)

53.56 ± 42.75

54.27 ± 32.32

0.911*

55.32 ± 47.92

62.60 ± 36.76

0.272*

10

Mean MELD score

21.38 ± 8.90

16.24 ± 8.86

<0.001*

19.42 ± 8.30

11.77 ± 6.66

<0.001*

11

Child Pugh Class

A: n=11 (13.9%)

A: n=29 (36.7%)

0.156**

A: n=17 (19.3%)

A: n=44 (50.0%)

<0.001^

B: n=30 (38.0%)

B: n=37 (46.8%)

B: n=37 (42.0%)

B: n=29 (33.0%)

C: n=38 (48.1%)

C: n=13 (16.5%)

C: n=34 (38.6%)

C: n=15 (17.0%)

*P-value calculated by paired; ** P-value calculated by chi-square test. sample t-test; ** P-value calculated by chi-square

test.

Table 3: Comparison of severity markers before and after TACE (3 months after inclusion into the study).

4. Discussion

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) reformed the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma when it was pioneered in the ’90s. In the present day, transarterial chemoembolization is the treatment modality of preference for high burden hepatocellular carcinoma. Innumerable case reports and retrospective studies have reported the concrete efficacy of TACE in curing carcinoma of the liver. Our study aims to report the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization and alterations in laboratory parameters in patients of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after undergoing TACE in lieu with size >3cm or <3cm of the tumor. Miscellaneous studies reported mean age of patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma >50 years, concurrent with outcomes of our study [19, 37, 38, 39], but insufficient studies also reported mean age <50 years thus quoting results dissimilar to our study [40, 41]. Considerable studies cited increased age when compared to our study thus contradicting our finding [42-44], while the trivial study had its median correlating with our study [45]. Hepatocellular carcinoma has increased affinity towards the male gender, conclusion declared by abundant studies, thus coinciding with the outcome of our study [19, 37, 39, 40, 42]. Our study pronounced hepatitis C as the known cause of hepatocellular carcinoma, an outcome concurrent with findings cited by countable studies [19, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 47], while equivalent studies reported hepatitis B as a prominent cause of carcinoma thus contravening our outcome [39, 40, 41, 43, 45, 48]. Infrequent studies indicated diabetes mellitus as the most prominent co-morbid present in patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma, finding corresponding with our study [46, 47]. Many of the sufferers included in our sample population were devoid of any co-morbidity.

 

Extensive studies concluded an ample number of sufferers of hepatocellular carcinoma categorized in Child Pugh’s class A, an outcome opposing result of our study inferring mass of sufferers categorized in Child Pugh’s class C [19, 37, 38, 40, 43, 45, 46]. Multiple studies concluded liver tumor as high-burden hepatocellular carcinoma in terms of size of the tumor with >3 cm tumor size reported by significant studies, corresponding with our outcome [37, 44, 45], while negligible study reported tumor size <3 cm thus contradicting our finding [43]. Extensive studies conducted observing the effect of TACE on laboratory parameters of patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma reported increased median values of total bilirubin when compared to our study [37, 40, 44, 48], while equivalent studies cited decreased values [19, 39, 43, 46], both outcomes contravening our study. The median value of platelet count in multiple studies was found to be coinciding with values calculated by our study [37, 39, 46], while some studies also reported declined values [19, 38]. Substantial studies conducted observed median values of serum albumin increased when compared to our results [19, 37, 39, 40, 43, 44, 48]. Decreased median values of serum creatinine were detected in various studies opposing findings noted in our study [19, 39, 46]. One study reported median value of alanine transaminase similar to value demarcated by our study, thus correlating with our outcome [37], while few studies quoted decreased values [19, 46], and an infrequent study detected increased alanine transaminase compared with our study [40]. The majority of studies regulated were indicative of increased INR in patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma, therefore median values are similar to our study [37, 39, 43, 44]. A study detected the median value of mean meld score diminished when paralleled with the value of our study, therefore, contrasting our outcome [43]. Another study regulated by Katayama et al had an entirely different perspective regarding prognosis and overall survival among patients of hepatocellular carcinoma electing for the procedure of TACE, suggestive of the number of tumors present in the patient of stage B of BCLC staging system as a predictive factor for prognosis rather than the size of the tumor [49].

5. Conclusion

Our study highlights the efficacious effects of transarterial chemoembolization in curing high burden hepatocellular carcinoma measuring >3cm or above and prominent downregulating alterations were observed in laboratory parameters, scores, and staging criteria. A significant decline in levels of INR, bilirubin, and creatinine was witnessed along with a decrease in meld score in patients with tumor size >3cm opting for the procedure of TACE. The majority of sufferers with tumor size >3cm and categorized in Child Pugh’s class C had improvements and transcended to class A and B proving the efficiency of TACE in curing high burden hepatocellular carcinoma.

References

  1. McGlynn KA, London WT. Epidemiology and natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma; Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology 19 (2005): 3-23.
  2. Montalto G, Cervello M, Giannitrapani L, et al. Epidemiology, risk factors, and natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann N Y Acad Sci 963 (2002): 13-20.
  3. But DYK, Lai CL, Yuen MF. Natural history of hepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 14 (2008): 1652-1656.
  4. Bialecki, Eldad S, Bisceglie D, et al. Clinical presentation and natural course of hepatocellular carcinoma. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 17 (2005): 485-489.
  5. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55 (2005): 74-108.
  6. Tang A, Hallouch O, Chernyak V, et al. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: target population for surveillance and diagnosis. Abdominal Radiology 43 (2018): 13-25.
  7. Tangkijvanich P, Mahachai V, Suwangool P, et al. Gender difference in clinicopathologic features and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World Journal of Gastroenterology 10 (2004): 1547-1550.
  8. Bosch FX, Ribes J, Cléries R, et al. Epidemiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clinics in liver disease 9 (2005): 191-211.
  9. Chen CJ, Yu MW, Liaw YF. Epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 12 (1997): 294-308.
  10. Lai CL, LAM KC, Wong KP, et al. Clinical features of hepatocellular carcinoma. Review of 211 patients in Hong Kong 47 (1981): 2746-2755.
  11. Luo JC, Hwang SJ, Wu JC, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with paraneoplastic syndromes. Hepato-gastroenterology 49 (2002): 1315-1319.
  12. Mahmood K, Naqvi IH, Mahmood A, et al. Deal a death blow! HCC in cirrhotics – thrombotic complications: their frequency, characteristics, and risk factors. Prz Gastroenterol 13 (2018): 52-60.
  13. Saurin JC, Tanière P, Mion F, et al. Primary hepatocellular carcinoma in workers exposed to vinyl chloride. CANCER 79 (1997): 1671-1677.
  14. Erstad DJ, Tanabe KK. Hepatocellular carcinoma: early-stage management challenges. Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma 4 (2017): 81-92.
  15. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 359 (2008): 378-390.
  16. Wáng YX, De Baere T, Idée JM, et al. Transcatheter embolization therapy in liver cancer: an update of clinical evidences. Chin J Cancer Res 27 (2015): 96-121.
  17. Guan YS, He Q, MQ. Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization: History for More than 30 Years. ISRN Gastroenterology (2012): 1-8.
  18. Sacco R, Mismas V, Marceglia S, et al. Transarterial radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: An update and perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 21 (2015): 6518-6525.
  19. Hatanaka T, Arai H, Kakizaki S. Balloon-occluded transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 10 (2018): 485-495.
  20. Raoul JL, Forner A, Bolondi L, et al. Updated use of TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: How and when to use it based on clinical evidence. Cancer Treat Rev 72 (2019): 28-36.
  21. Baur J, Ritter C, Germer C, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research 8 (2016): 69-74.
  22. Valeshabad AK, Kuwahara J, Ray Jr CE. cTACE: The Rebirth of Lipiodol. Endovascular Today 17 (2018): 36-43.
  23. Horikawa M, Miyayama S, Irie T, et al. Development of Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinomas in Japan: Historical, Strategic, and Technical Review. American Journal of Roentgenology 205 (2015): 764-773.
  24. DEB-TACE for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (QED). Clinical Trial (2018).
  25. Luz JHM, Luz PM, Martin HS, et al. DEB TACE for Intermediate and advanced HCC - Initial Experience in a Brazilian Cancer Center. Cancer Imaging 17 (2017): 5.
  26. Pons F, Varela M, Llovet JM. Staging systems in hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 7 (2005): 35-41.
  27. Kohla MA, Abu Zeid MI, Al-Warraky M, et al. Predictors of hepatic decompensation after TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2 (2015): e000032.
  28. Kong JY, Li SM, Fan HY, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization extends long-term survival in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 97 (2018): e11872.
  29. Zhou WP, Lai EC, Li AJ, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization for resectable large hepatocellular carcinoma. Annals of Surgery 249 (2009): 195-202.
  30. Majno PE, Adam R, Bismuth H, et al. Influence of preoperative transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization on resection and transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Annals of Surgery 226 (1997): 688-701.
  31. Yoo H, Kim JH, Ko GY, et al. Sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and portal vein embolization versus portal vein embolization only before major hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Annal of Surgical Oncology 18 (2011): 1251-1257.
  32. Nishida K, Lefor AK, Funabiki T. Rupture of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Transarterial Chemoembolization followed by Massive Gastric Bleeding. Case Reports in Hepatology (2018): 1-5.
  33. Marcacuzco Quinto A, Nutu O-A, San Roma´n Manso R, et al. Complicaciones de la quimioembolizacio´n transarterial (QETA) en el tratamiento de los tumores hepa´ticos. Cir Esp (2018): 1-8.
  34. Tsurusaki M, Murakami T. Surgical and Locoregional Therapy of HCC: TACE. Liver Cancer 4 (2015): 165-175.
  35. Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 362 (2003): 1907-1917.
  36. Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology 37 (2003): 429-442.
  37. Wang H, Du P, Wu M, et al. Postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization for multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma within the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer early stage and microvascular invasion. HepatoBiliary Surg Nutr 7 (2018): 418-428.
  38. Nakazawa T, Hidaka H, Shibuya A, et al. Overall survival in response to sorafenib versus radiotherapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with major portal vein thrombosis: propensity score analysis. BMC Gastroenterology 14 (2014): 84.
  39. Bettinger D, Spode R, Glaser N, et al. Survival benefit of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma: a single center experience. BMC Gastroenterology 17 (2017): 98.
  40. Zhang Y, Wei W, Wang J, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization combined with sorafenib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatic vein tumor thrombus. OncoTargets and Therapy 9 (2016): 4239-4246.
  41. Ren B, Wang W, Shen J, et al. Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Combined with Sorafenib versus TACE Alone for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study. Journal of cancer 10 (2019): 1189-1196.
  42. Yamakado K, Miyayama S, Hirota S, et al. Subgrouping of intermediate-stage (BCLC stage B) hepatocellular carcinoma based on tumor number and size and Child–Pugh grade correlated with prognosis after transarterial chemoembolization. Jpn J Radiol 32 (2014): 260-265.
  43. Baek M, Yoo J, jeong S, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma less than 5 cm treated with transarterial chemoembolization. Korean J Intern Med 34 (2019): 1223-1232.
  44. Waked I, Berhane S, Toyoda H, et al. Transarterial chemo-embolisation of hepatocellular carcinoma: impact of liver function and vascular invasion. British Journal of cancer 116 (2017): 448-454.
  45. Zhu K, Huang J, Lai L, et al. Medium or large hepatocellular carcinoma: Sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation. Radiology 288 (2018): 300-307.
  46. Amisaki M, Honjo S, Morimoto M, et al. The Negative Effect of Preoperative Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization on Long-Term Outcomes for Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Yonago Acta medica 59 (2016): 270-278.
  47. Mansoor H, Masood M, Siddique K, et al. Clinical features and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma at a cancer treatment facility. Biomedical Research and Therapy 11 (2019): 3492- 3500.
  48. Zhu K, Chen J, Lai L, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: Treatment with Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Sorafenib—A Retrospective Controlled Study. Radiology 272 (2014): 284-293.
  49. Katayama K, Imai T, Abe Y, et al. Number of Nodules but not Size of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Can Predict Refractoriness to Transarterial Chemoembolization and Poor Prognosis. J Clin Med Res 10 (2018): 765-771.

Journal Statistics

Impact Factor: * 4.1

CiteScore: 2.9

Acceptance Rate: 11.01%

Time to first decision: 10.4 days

Time from article received to acceptance: 2-3 weeks

Discover More: Recent Articles

Grant Support Articles

© 2016-2024, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved!