Abstracting and Indexing

  • CrossRef
  • WorldCat
  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academic Keys
  • DRJI
  • Microsoft Academic
  • Academia.edu
  • OpenAIRE

Neonatal Leukemoid Reaction Caused by Enterococcus Fecalis Septicemia

Article Information

Yang L, Liu ZJ, Chen LQ, Hu JL, Zou N*

Department of Pediatrics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Shahekou, Dalian, China

*Corresponding Author: Dr. Zou N, Department of Pediatrics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 467 Zhongshan Road, Shahekou District, Dalian 116027, China

Received: 22 November 2019; Accepted: 06 December 2019; Published: 20 January 2020

Citation: Yang L, Liu ZJ, Chen LQ, Hu JL, Zou N. Neonatal Leukemoid Reaction Caused by Enterococcus Fecalis Septicemia. Archives of Clinical and Medical Case Reports 4 (2020): 086-090.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook

Abstract

Background: Leukemoid reaction is not uncommon in neonatal period. It is usualy caused by Down syndrome, antenatal corticosteroids, or perinatal infections. The Enterococcus fecalis is a kind of nosocomial opportunistic pathogen and can cause neonatal septicemia with high mortality. However, neonatal leukemoid reaction induced by Enterococcus fecalis septicemiais is relativity rare. Here, we reported a three-day-old newborn suffered from leukemoid reaction caused by Enterococcus fecalis septicemia.

Case Description: A three-day old boy was hospitalized in our NICU of the Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University for jaundice and leukocytosis with comphalitis. Blood routine test displayed leukocytosis with immature cells, bone marrow smear examination showed leukemoid reactions, and the secretion of umbilicus culture showed infection of Enterococcus fecalis. Cefathiamidine was administrated for anti-infection. The baby symptoms eased rapidly, and leukocytosis was return to normal gradually.

Conclusion: Enterococcus fecalis can cause neonatal septicemia, which can lead to neonatal leukemoid reaction. Early diagnosis and reasonable antibiotics administration are very important to improve the prognosis of neonatal leukemoid reaction.

Keywords

Leukemoid reaction; Newborn; Enterococcus fecalis

Leukemoid reaction articles, Newborn articles, Enterococcus fecalis articles

Leukemoid reaction articles Leukemoid reaction Research articles Leukemoid reaction review articles Leukemoid reaction PubMed articles Leukemoid reaction PubMed Central articles Leukemoid reaction 2023 articles Leukemoid reaction 2024 articles Leukemoid reaction Scopus articles Leukemoid reaction impact factor journals Leukemoid reaction Scopus journals Leukemoid reaction PubMed journals Leukemoid reaction medical journals Leukemoid reaction free journals Leukemoid reaction best journals Leukemoid reaction top journals Leukemoid reaction free medical journals Leukemoid reaction famous journals Leukemoid reaction Google Scholar indexed journals Newborn articles Newborn Research articles Newborn review articles Newborn PubMed articles Newborn PubMed Central articles Newborn 2023 articles Newborn 2024 articles Newborn Scopus articles Newborn impact factor journals Newborn Scopus journals Newborn PubMed journals Newborn medical journals Newborn free journals Newborn best journals Newborn top journals Newborn free medical journals Newborn famous journals Newborn Google Scholar indexed journals Enterococcus fecalis articles Enterococcus fecalis Research articles Enterococcus fecalis review articles Enterococcus fecalis PubMed articles Enterococcus fecalis PubMed Central articles Enterococcus fecalis 2023 articles Enterococcus fecalis 2024 articles Enterococcus fecalis Scopus articles Enterococcus fecalis impact factor journals Enterococcus fecalis Scopus journals Enterococcus fecalis PubMed journals Enterococcus fecalis medical journals Enterococcus fecalis free journals Enterococcus fecalis best journals Enterococcus fecalis top journals Enterococcus fecalis free medical journals Enterococcus fecalis famous journals Enterococcus fecalis Google Scholar indexed journals fecalis articles fecalis Research articles fecalis review articles fecalis PubMed articles fecalis PubMed Central articles fecalis 2023 articles fecalis 2024 articles fecalis Scopus articles fecalis impact factor journals fecalis Scopus journals fecalis PubMed journals fecalis medical journals fecalis free journals fecalis best journals fecalis top journals fecalis free medical journals fecalis famous journals fecalis Google Scholar indexed journals NICU articles NICU Research articles NICU review articles NICU PubMed articles NICU PubMed Central articles NICU 2023 articles NICU 2024 articles NICU Scopus articles NICU impact factor journals NICU Scopus journals NICU PubMed journals NICU medical journals NICU free journals NICU best journals NICU top journals NICU free medical journals NICU famous journals NICU Google Scholar indexed journals treatment articles treatment Research articles treatment review articles treatment PubMed articles treatment PubMed Central articles treatment 2023 articles treatment 2024 articles treatment Scopus articles treatment impact factor journals treatment Scopus journals treatment PubMed journals treatment medical journals treatment free journals treatment best journals treatment top journals treatment free medical journals treatment famous journals treatment Google Scholar indexed journals defibrillator articles defibrillator Research articles defibrillator review articles defibrillator PubMed articles defibrillator PubMed Central articles defibrillator 2023 articles defibrillator 2024 articles defibrillator Scopus articles defibrillator impact factor journals defibrillator Scopus journals defibrillator PubMed journals defibrillator medical journals defibrillator free journals defibrillator best journals defibrillator top journals defibrillator free medical journals defibrillator famous journals defibrillator Google Scholar indexed journals patient articles patient Research articles patient review articles patient PubMed articles patient PubMed Central articles patient 2023 articles patient 2024 articles patient Scopus articles patient impact factor journals patient Scopus journals patient PubMed journals patient medical journals patient free journals patient best journals patient top journals patient free medical journals patient famous journals patient Google Scholar indexed journals blood articles blood Research articles blood review articles blood PubMed articles blood PubMed Central articles blood 2023 articles blood 2024 articles blood Scopus articles blood impact factor journals blood Scopus journals blood PubMed journals blood medical journals blood free journals blood best journals blood top journals blood free medical journals blood famous journals blood Google Scholar indexed journals AICD articles AICD Research articles AICD review articles AICD PubMed articles AICD PubMed Central articles AICD 2023 articles AICD 2024 articles AICD Scopus articles AICD impact factor journals AICD Scopus journals AICD PubMed journals AICD medical journals AICD free journals AICD best journals AICD top journals AICD free medical journals AICD famous journals AICD Google Scholar indexed journals

Article Details

1. Introduction

Neonatal leukemoid reaction (NLR) is defined as the white blood cell (WBC) count >50 × 109/L or absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >30 × 109/L (within 1 week after birth) or ANC greater than 2 standard deviations of the corresponding mean gestational age, with immature cells [1]. Many causes contribute to NLR. The common diseases are Down syndrome, antenatal corticosteroids, chorioamnionitis, funisitis, perinatal infections and so on [2]. The Enterococcus fecalis (E. fecalis) is a kind of nosocomial opportunistic pathogen, which is known to cause neonatal septicemia with high mortality. However, the incidence of NLR in E. fecalis septicemia is rare, and few papers have been reported [3]. Here, we reported a neonatal LR caused by E. fecalis septicemia and provided clinical experience for its early diagnosis and treatment.

2. Clinical Information

A three-day-old boy was admitted to our NICU of the Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University for jaundice and leukocytosis. He was G1P1, 41+3wk, with the birth weight of 3490g and no asphyxia. On the second day after birth, the boy was poor feeding with less activity, skin jaundice and abdominal distention. WBC count of 56.43 × 109/L, with an ANC of 44.58 × 109/L. Total bilirubin was 275.3umol/L. Physical examination: T: 36.7°C P: 138/min, R: 34/min, BP 66/40 mmHg, yellow staining of sclera, face and trunk skin. The liver and spleen were not touched under the rib. The umbilical ring was red and swollen, and purulent and bloody secretions were also seen in the umbilical fossa. Laboratory testing: WBC count of 54.23 × 109/L, with an ANC of 42.11 × 109/L, 6% myelocyte, and 7% metamylocyte. C-reactive protein (CRP) was 14.88 mg/dl, and Procalcitonin (PCT) was 0.27 ng/ml. The cefoperazone was administrated empirically, and other symptomatic and supportive treatments were also given. But the baby condition has not improved. Three days later, WBC count was 50.07 × 109/L, with an ANC of 39.05 × 109/L; the secretion of umbilicus culture showed growth of E. fecalis. Then the antibiotics were changed to cefathiamidine which was reasonable according to drug sensitivity later. Bone marrow smear examination showed distinctly active proliferation of nucleated cell without any blast cells. Erythrocyte and megakaryocyte series were normal. Examination of blood culture, urine culture, stool culture, cerebrospinal fluid were all normal. After 3 days of cefathiamidine therapy, the baby’s condition has been in remission and the blood counts started to decrease. WBC became 38.41 × 109/L, with an ANC of 26.11 × 109/L, and one week of the treatment, WBC was 25.26 × 109/L. CRP and PCT remained negative all throughout. The swelling of umbilicus and secretion of umbilicus were disappeared. After 10 days of cefathiamidine therapy, the repeated secretion of umbilicus culture was sterile. Cefathiamidine were continued for 14 days and WBC returned to normal (Table 1). The neonate was discharged.

After being discharged, the patient was followed up on 42 days after birth, and the growth and development of the infant were normal. WBC count was 10.1 × 109/L, with an ANC of 5.2 × 109/L. Hemoglobin was 13.3 g/dL and platelet count was 199 × 109/L, showing that all values were normal.

 

Before Therapy

After Cefathiamidine Therapy

Day 3

Day 5

Day 7

Day 10

Day 14

WBC (× 109/L)

54.23

38.41

33.67

25.26

20.23

17.22

ANC (× 109/L)

42.11

26.11

22.22

15.91

11.12

8.95

Hemoglobin (g/dL)

20.3

18.6

17.0

15.5

15.2

14.6

Platelet count

( × 109/L)

138

142

158

195

188

208

Immature cells

(%)

6% Myelocyte,

7% Metamylocyte

2% Promyelocyt,

2% Myelocyte

Negative

2% Myelocyte,

3% Atypical Lymphocytes

Negative

Negative

CRP (mg/dl)

14.88

6.64

2.58

Negative

Negative

Negative

Procalcitonin (PCT) (ng/ml)

0.27

0.06

Negative

Negative

Negative

Negative

Total Bilirubin (umol/L)

302.23

268.99

148.78

132.02

101.23

86.78

Table 1: The change in laboratory finding before and after Cefathiamidine therapy.

3. Discussion

Neonatal sepsis is classified as early-onset (EOS) and late-onset (LOS), according to the age of onset and timing of the sepsis episode. Traditionally, laboratory-confirmed neonatal sepsis is diagnosed by isolating the causative agent from a normally sterile body site (blood, CSF, urine, pleural, joint, and peritoneal fluids) [4]. When blood and other sterile site cultures are negative, but the infant manifests symptoms (such as temperature instability, poor feeding, less cry, less movement, abdominal distention, hepatomegaly, apnoea, Jaundice, et al.) consistent with infection, which may be considered as “clinical”sepsis [5]. The commonly used non-culture based diagnostic tests include: leukocytosis (WBC >30 × 109/L between 6 h to 3 day after birth or WBC >20 × 109/L 3 day after birth) or leukocytopenia (WBC <5 × 109/L); The ratio of immature to total neutrophils (I/T) increased (I/T >0.16 within 3 day after birth or I/T >0.12 3 day after birth); CRP increased (>3 mg/dl within 6 h after birth, >5 mg/dl between 6 to 24 h after birth or >5 mg/dl 24 h after birth); PCT>0.5 ng/ml [6-7]. Enterococcus is a normal colonizing bacteria in human intestine [8], but it can also cause early neonatal septicemia (EOS). Stoll et al. reported that 3% of 389 children with EOS were caused by Enterococcus faecalis infection [9].

The neonatal leukemoid reaction is common in clinic, especially in premature and low birth weight infants, and the incidence varies from 1.3% to 15% [10-11]. It is due to some non-leukemic factors that induce the release of some cytokines from bone marrow and cause the hyperproliferation reaction of normal bone marrow. The most common clinical reaction is neutropenia, most of which is an acute inflammatory reaction caused by infection factors. Moreover, the peripheral blood smear shows nuclear shifting to the left, immature granulocytes, toxic particles, alkaline phosphatase activity and integral of neutrophils. NLR can be mainly divided into infection factors and non-infection factors. Infection factors are the most common factors in neonatal leukemoid reactions, including bacterial, fungal, viral, spirochete, Rickettsia and so on [12]. It does not require special treatment. When the primary cause is removed, the hemogram can gradually recover.

This case is characterized by Enterococcus faecalis omphalitis, EOS and NLR. The diagnosis of this case is clinical septicemia. Although there was no evidence of positive blood bacterial culture, the clinical manifestation with increasing WBC and CRP supported for clinical septicemia diagnosis, and it was considered that Enterococcus faecalis from the umbilicus enters the blood to bring about leukocyte like reaction caused by septicemia. As we know that Enterococcus faecalis is a common colonizing bacterium. But for newborns, due to the low immune function, bacteria and their toxins can enter the blood circulation through the fracture before the umbilical cord falls off, which is easy to develop into septicemia. This makes us pay more attention to neonatal comphalitis. Early diagnosis and sensitive antibiotics administration are very important to improve the prognosis of neonatal leukemoid reaction.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare to have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hsiao R, Omar SA. Outcome of extremely low birth weight infants with leukemoid reaction. Pediatrics 116 (2005): e43-e51.
  2. Jansen E, Emmen J, Mohns T, et al. Extreme hyperleucocytosis of the premature. BMJ Case Rep (2013): bcr2012008385.
  3. Kumar A1, Kumar P, Basu S. Enterococcus fecalis Sepsis and Leukemoid Reaction: An Unusual Association at Birth.J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 37 (2015): e419-e420.
  4. Shane AL, Sánchez PJ, Stoll BJ. Neonatal sepsis. Lancet 390 (2017): 1770-1780.
  5. Wynn JL. Defining neonatal sepsis. Curr Opin Pediatr 28 (2016): 135-140.
  6. Resch B, Renoldner B, Hofer N. Comparison Between Pathogen Associated Laboratory and Clinical Parameters in Early-Onset Sepsis of the Newborn. Open Microbiol J 10 (2016): 133-139.
  7. Wang J, Yu J, Fan J, et al. Evaluation of altitude-appropriate reference ranges for neutrophils in diagnosis of sepsis in very low birth weight infants: A multicenter retrospective study. PLoS One 12 (2017): e0171571.
  8. Fisher K, Phillips C. The ecology, epidemiology and virulence of Enterococcus. Microbiology 155 (2009): 1749-1757.
  9. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Sanchez PJ, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Early onset neonatal sepsis: the burden of group B Streptococcal and coli disease continues. Pediatrics 127 (2011): 817-826.
  10. Wirbelauer J, Thomas W, Siauw C, et al. Leukemoid reaction in extremely immature preterm infants. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 212 (2008): 165-169.
  11. Duran R, Ozbek UV, Ciftdemir NA, et al. The relationship between leukemoid reaction and perinatal morbidity, mortality, and chorioamnionitis in low birth weight infants. Int J Infect Dis 14 (2010): e998-e1001.
  12. Naaraayan A, Aleta M, Basak P, et al. Leukemoid reaction to Clostridium difficile infection. Anaerobe 34 (2015): 158-160.

Journal Statistics

Impact Factor: * 3.1

CiteScore: 2.9

Acceptance Rate: 11.01%

Time to first decision: 10.4 days

Time from article received to acceptance: 2-3 weeks

Discover More: Recent Articles

Grant Support Articles

    Editor In Chief

    Yasuo Iwasaki

  • Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine
    Toho University School of Medicine
    Ota-ku, Tokyo, Japan

© 2016-2024, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved!