Svetlana Tikhonova published latest article in Journal of dental education entitled Cariology Education in Canadian Dental Schools: Where Are We? Where Do We Need to Go? This article is available in PubMed with an unique identification number PMID: 29292324 and it is published in 2018. The coauthors of this article are Tikhonova S, Girard F, Fontana M.
Co-Author(s): Tikhonova, S; Girard, F; Fontana, M
Affiliation(s): Dr. Tikhonova is Faculty Lecturer, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University; Dr. Girard is Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Universit? de Montr?al; Dr. Fontana is Professor of Cariology, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan. firstname.lastname@example.org.
PMID 29292324, Year 2018
Abstract: The aim of this study was to document cariology education across Canadian dental schools. Ten faculty members who supervise cariology education at each of the ten Canadian dental schools were invited to participate in the study in 2016. An adapted version of the European Organization for Caries Research-Association for Dental Education in Europe cariology curriculum group questionnaire was used. Representatives of all ten dental schools completed the questionnaire, for a 100% response rate. In four schools, cariology and restorative dentistry were taught by the same department. Five schools had didactic/laboratory courses focusing primarily on cariology as well as a specific written curriculum. Six schools provided cariology-related hands-on workshops/laboratories before students started working with patients. In teaching cariology, seven institutions included dental hard tissues defects. The following caries detection methods were addressed didactically in cariology education: visual (10/10 total schools), tactile (9/10), International Caries Detection and Assessment System criteria (6/10), caries activity assessment (9/10), radiographic (10/10), and other detection tools (8/10). Seven schools charted activity of carious lesions in clinic. Only one school used the concept of caries risk assessment regularly in clinic. Clinical cariology teaching was carried out mostly by private dentists hired as clinical instructors (7/10) and faculty members involved in didactic cariology education (9/10). Calibration of faculty members for caries detection criteria was reported by only one school. The main concern reported by all institutions was the difficulty of implementing didactic instruction on cariology into clinical training. This study found that contemporary cariology concepts are in the process of being implemented in didactic education across Canadian dental schools, but all schools lacked appropriate integration of cariology education into clinical training. These findings suggest a need for harmonization of evidence-based cariology education in Canada.
Journal: Journal of dental education