Abstracting and Indexing

  • CrossRef
  • WorldCat
  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academic Keys
  • DRJI
  • Microsoft Academic
  • Academia.edu
  • OpenAIRE

Pancreatic Mass Due to Fungal Infection Without Any Documented Pancreatitis – A Case Report

Article Information

Abhishek Das1, Debashis Misra1*, Ranajoy Ghosh2, Aniket Halder2

1Division of Gastroenterology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India

2Division of Pathology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India

*Corresponding Author: Debashis Misra, Division of Gastroenterology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India.

Received: 23 October 2019; Accepted: 15 November 2019; Published: 08 January 2020

Citation: Abhishek Das, Debashis Misra, Ranajoy Ghosh,Aniket Halder. Pancreatic Mass Due To Fungal Infection Without Any Documented Pancreatitis – A Case Report. Archives of Clinical and Medical Case Reports 4 (2020): 055-058.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook

Abstract

45 year old male with history of regular alcohol use, but without any documented evidence of pancreatitis presented with features of biliary obstruction which an evaluation came out to be related to pancreatic head mass. Subsequent evaluation revealed candida infection of pancreas to be the reason for mass formation and biliary obstruction.

Candida articles, Fungus articles, Infection articles, Pancreatitis articles, Pancreatic mass articles

Article Details

1. Introduction

Fungal infection of pancreas is of uncommon occurrence. Pancreatic necrosis in background of acute pancreatitis is one of the risk factors for this infection. We report a case of fungal infection of the pancreas in the absence of documented pancreatitis or of pancreatic necrosis.

2. Case Report

We report a case of 45 years old male, presented with intermittent poorly localised dull aching right upper quadrant pain abdomen for the last 1 year. Each episode used to last for 5-6 hours, only to get terminated with oral analgesics. It was associated with non bilious vomiting. The frequency of pain abdomen was 1-2 times per month for the first 6 months, which increased in frequency in the last 2 months requiring oral analgesics on a regular basis and multiple hospitalisations. He had episodes of intermittent jaundice with acholic stools for the past 9 months. He had lost 10kg of weight in the past 1 year. He used to consume alcohol for the last 10 years with daily consumption of 2-3 drinks of country liquor. On examination, he had icterus and tenderness in the right upper quadrant. Hematological investigations revealed Hb-12g%, Total leucocyte count-7600 /micL, Platelets-1.6 lacs/micL. Liver function test revealed Bilirubin (Total/Direct)-5.4/3.9 mg/dl; ALT-320U/L, AST-300 U/L, ALP-657 U/L, Total Protein-8.3 g/dl, Serum albumin-4.4 g/dl, normal serum Amylase. Trans abdominal ultrasound showed dilated intrahepatic biliary radicles & dilated common bile duct (CBD). There was a 3 × 2.5 cm hypoechoic heterogenous mass noted in the head of the pancreas with dilated Main Pancreatic Duct (MPD). Contrast enhanced CT scan (Figure 1) revealed a well defined patchily enhancing heterogenous mass lesion (35 × 34 × 32 mm) in the head of pancreas extending into the uncinate process with necrotic areas within. MPD was dilated (6 mm in head). Serum CA 19-9 was low (4.51 U/ml). For further delineation of the mass and tissue diagnosis, Linear Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) was performed. It revealed the same heterogenous pancreatic head mass with dilated CBD (12 mm) and dilated MPD (5 mm at body) (Figure 2). EUS guided FNAC was done from the mass. Histopathological examination revealed sparse cellularity in a necrotic background with scattered foreign body type giant cells (Figure 3) with few monolayer sheets of benign ductal cells. Fungal profiles are seen in background with pseudohyphae and budding yeast forms suggestive of invasive Candida infection (Figure 4). He was started on IV amphotericin and he recovered well.

fortune-biomass-feedstock

Figure 1: Dual phase CECT upper abdomen showing SOL in head of pancreas.

fortune-biomass-feedstock

Figure 2: Linear EUS image showing heterogenous SOL in head of pancreas.

fortune-biomass-feedstock

Figure 3: Foreign body giant cells (400X magnification) in FNAC sample from pancreatic SOL.

fortune-biomass-feedstock

Figure 4: Psudohyphae of candida (400X magnification) in FNAC sample from pancreatic SOL.

3. Discussion

Bacterial and fungal infections of the pancreas are well documented complications in the setting of severe acute pancreatitis. It is one of the leading causes of mortality in acute necrotising pancreatitis [1]. Candida sp. is the most common species causing fungal infection of the pancreas. Intra-abdominal Candida infection is associated with a four-fold greater mortality rate compared with intra-abdominal bacterial infection alone in patients with acute pancreatitis1. Important risk factors for fungal infection in patients with acute pancreatitis include broad-spectrum antibiotics, prolonged hospitalization and surgical/endoscopic interventions, use of total parenteral nutrition, and mechanical ventilation [2]. Other conditions that result in an altered host immune system such as steroid therapy, chemotherapy, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), immunosuppression therapy after organ transplantation, advanced age, and comorbid illnesses such as diabetes mellitus also predispose patients to fungal infection [3]. Though, the patient described above had history of frequent use of alcohol and presented with intermittent pain abdomen, there was no biochemical or radiological evidences to support acute pancreatitis. There was no evidence of pancreatic necrosis as well. The patient was apparently immunocompetent. Therefore, the unique feature of this case is the occurrence of fungal infection in non necrosed pancreatic parenchyma.

Among various sources of pancreatic fungal infections, Candida is the most common causal organism, followed by Torulopsis species [3]. The incidence of Candida infection in acute pancreatitis has been reported to range from 12% to 41%. Diagnosis of pancreatic infection is made when infective organisms are identified from aspirate or blood culture. However, routine blood cultures are positive in only 50% of patients with tissue-proven disseminated candidiasis [4]. In our case, we identified fungal elements like pseudohyphae, budding yeast forms from the aspirated sample. These were suggestive of Candida infection. Moreover, presence of foreign body type multinucleated giant cells was suggestive of tissue reaction to the infection.In this case, the patient presented with features of extrahepatic biliary obstruction, with a mass in the head of the pancreas. We kept carcinoma head of pancreas, solid pseudopapillary tumor and cystic pancreatic neoplasm with solid components and chronic pancreatitis in the differential diagnosis keeping in mind the clinical presentation. However no definitive radiological evidences of chronic pancreatitis were found.

In conclusion, we suggest that pancreatic candida infection can present in a similar fashion as pancreatic neoplasms. Pancreatic fungal infiltration should be kept in the differential diagnoses in these cases.

Acknowledgement

Radiology Department, Bharat Sebashram Sangha Hospital, Kolkata

Conflict of Interest

None

References

  1. Hoerauf A, Hammer S, Müller-Myhsok B, et al. Intra-abdominal Candida infection during acute necrotizing pancreatitis has a high prevalence and is associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 26 (1998): 2010-2015.
  2. Kochhar R, Noor MT, Wig J. Fungal infections in severe acute pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26 (2011): 952-959.
  3. Shanmugam N, Isenmann R, Barkin JS, et al. Pancreatic fungal infection. Pancreas 27 (2003): 33-138.
  4. Gregory DW. Saturday Conference: Candida South Med J 75 (1982): 339-345.

Journal Statistics

Impact Factor: * 3.1

CiteScore: 2.9

Acceptance Rate: 11.01%

Time to first decision: 10.4 days

Time from article received to acceptance: 2-3 weeks

Discover More: Recent Articles

Grant Support Articles

    Editor In Chief

    Yasuo Iwasaki

  • Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine
    Toho University School of Medicine
    Ota-ku, Tokyo, Japan

© 2016-2024, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved!