A Rare and Aggressive Uterine Cancer: Carcinosarcoma
Catarina Reis-de-Carvalho1*, André Borges2, Dusan Djokovic2
1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Portugal
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Portugal
*Corresponding Author: Dr. Catarina Reis-de-Carvalho, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Portugal
Received: 15 March 2020; Accepted: 02 April 2020; Published: 09 April 2020
Article Information
Citation: Catarina Reis-de-Carvalho, André Borges, Dusan Djokovic. A Rare and Aggressive Uterine Cancer: Carcinosarcoma. Journal of Radiology and Clinical Imaging 3 (2020): 056-057.
View / Download Pdf Share at FacebookKeywords
<p>Uterine carcinosarcoma; Mullerian tumor; Uterine cancer; Carcinosarcoma</p>
Article Details
1. Case Presentation
Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), previously known as malignant mixed Mullerian tumor, is a very rare tumor of the female reproductive tract, composed of both high-grade sarcomatous and carcinomatous elements [1]. In the United States its incidence is 1-4 per 100,000 women, is more frequently find in black women and the median age at diagnosis is between 62-67 years old [1]. Risk factors for developing UCS include advanced age, obesity, nulliparity, exogenous estrogen use, pelvic radiation, and tamoxifen [2]. Due to its aggressive nature, up to 60% have an extrauterine disease at presentation [3]. A pelvic ultrasound is the first-line imaging study. The typical appearance is a heterogeneous solid intrauterine mass with an irregular shape, hypoechoic and septated cystic echotexture, an ill-defined boundary, possible expansion of the endometrial canal, and abundant blood flow signals [4, 5]. UCS has a worse prognosis compared to other high-risk uterine endometrial cancers, with reported five-year disease-specific survival rates of 59% for stage I/II disease, 22% for stage III disease, and 9% for stage IV disease, regardless of therapy [2].
This image concerns a 58-year-old P1G1 woman with postmenopausal uterine bleeding and pelvic pain over the past 2 months. Ultrasound assessment, with endovaginal (Figure 1) and abdominal probes, revealed an enlarged uterus reaching the supraumbilical level and bearing a solid tumor with multiple cystic areas and a color Doppler score 4. The Pipelle sampling confirmed the diagnosis of carcinosarcoma in this patient who died two days later.

Figure 1: Ultrasound assessment, with endovaginal.
Transvaginal ultrasonography is appropriate for an initial evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding. Endometrial thickness of 4 mm, or less, has a greater than 99% negative predictive value for endometrial cancer [6]. The ultrasound is not accurate to distinguish carcinosarcomas from other endometrial malignancies since the features of high-grade endometrial cancer also include heterogeneous echogenicity, high Color Doppler score, multifocal vessel pattern, and irregular myometrial-endometrial junction [6]. However, symptoms and clinical signs, along with the recognition of suspected ultrasound features presented here, should trigger prompt medical assistance to improve patient survival.
References
- Ravishankar P, Smith DA, Avril S, et al. Uterine carcinosarcoma: a primer for radiologists. Abdominal Radiology 44 (2019): 2874-2885.
- Sagebiel TL, Bhosale PR, Patnana M, et al. Uterine Carcinosarcomas. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI. 40 (2019): 295-301.
- Denschlag D, Ulrich UA. Uterine carcinosarcomas - Diagnosis and management. Oncology Research and Treatment 41 (2018): 675-679.
- Zhao F, Xu Y, Zhang H, et al. Ultrasonographic findings of uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Obstet Invest 84 (2019): 277-282.
- Hosh M, Antar S, Nazzal A, et al. Uterine Sarcoma: Analysis of 13,089 Cases Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26 (2016).
- Epstein E, Fischerova D, Valentin L, et al. Ultrasound characteristics of endometrial cancer as defined by International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) consensus nomenclature: prospective multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51 (2018): 818-828.