Abstracting and Indexing

  • Google Scholar
  • CrossRef
  • WorldCat
  • ResearchGate
  • Academic Keys
  • DRJI
  • Microsoft Academic
  • Academia.edu
  • OpenAIRE

Impact of Strabismus Management on the Retinal Microstructure

Article Information

Shreya Shah*, Mehul Shah, Vedant Rajoria, Raj Vador

Drashti Netralaya, Dahod, Gujarat, India

*Corresponding author: Shreya Shah, Drashti Netralaya, Nr. GIDC, Chakalia Road, Dahod-389151, Gujarat, India Received: 04 October 2022; Accepted: 12 October 2022; Published: 26 October 2022

Citation: Shreya Shah, Mehul Shah, Apeksha Kataria, Ashvini Korane. Impact of Strabismus Management on the Retinal Microstructure. Journal of Ophthalmology and Research 5 (2022): 136-140.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook

Abstract

To examine whether change in retinal structure can improve vision and stereoacuity following strabismus management

Keywords

Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), SD-OCT, CMT

Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) articles, SD-OCT articles, CMT articles

Article Details

1. Intruduction

A crucial dimension of vision is stereoacuity [1, 2, 3]. It is a vital type of binocular vision responsible for depth perception [2]. In aniseikonia, stereoacuity is affected [4]. Stereopsis is absent in strabismus [5, 6] and refractive errors [7, 8]. Numerous factors affect stereopsis including literacy, poor vision, age, amblyopia, and deprivation [9, 10]. Stereoacuity can be improved by treating its cause including refraction, strabismus, or cataract [11, 12, 13].

This study explored whether strabismus management can improve alignment. The aligned eye may exhibit improved stereopsis and thus binocular vision (ref). We explored the association of functional improvement with retina structure changes. We evaluated whether functional improvement leads neuroanabolism.

2. Methods

Both the study protocol and informed consent form were approved by the Hospital Ethical Committee of Drashti Netralaya and were according to the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration. We obtained written informed consent from the legal guardian or parents of each child, and each patient provided consent before study participation. This prospective cohort study recruited patients visiting the motility department who were diagnosed as having strabismus requiring surgical correction from 2018 to 2020. We excluded those with other pathology or neurological diseases that can affect the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), optic nerve head (ONH), or central macular thickness (CMT).

All patients received comprehensive eye assessments, which included slit lamp biomicroscope or handheld slit lamp evaluation for ocular alignment, A-scan ultrasound biometry, and tests for refraction and visual acuity (VA). Assessments were conducted under anesthesia in younger children who were unable to cooperate. We examined intraocular pressure by employing Perkins applanation tonometer. For children aged <3 years, monocular distance VA was tested. For nonverbal children, VA was examined based on a child’s ability to fix and follow objects. Fixation was determined by examining each eye’s ability to fixate on an object, maintain the fixation, and subsequently follow the object through varying gaze positions. Children aged 3–6 years were shown wall charts containing Snellen letters and numbers and subjected to the tumbling E test and HOTV as per the standard VA assessment. For children, single optotypes of ETDRS acuity charts with surrounding bars were presented. We examined cycloplegic refraction for all children.

An indirect ophthalmoscope with +20 D lens was employed to examine the posterior segment. We assessed near stereopsis using the Titmus circle (Titmus, Optical Co, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and the Randot circle (Stereo Optical Co). We examined distance stereopsis by employing the B-VAT II BVS contour circle of the Mentor B VAT II video acuity tester (Mentor O & O, Inc., Norwell, MA, USA). Motor and sensory adoption were assessed using various tests for all patients. All patients underwent surgery.

We measured distance stereopsis after strabismus and refractive error correction. An arc of 240 s was used with patients wearing liquid-crystal shutter glasses at a 6-m distance. A correct result indicated a successful test. However, for an incorrect result, patients were again shown the circle in different directions more than two consecutive times. If the patients obtained a correct result, they were administered next tests. However, in case of an incorrect result, patients were considered to have high stereopsis. If stereopsis was undetermined, previous steps were repeated again. When correct results were obtained for more than two consecutive times, we used the obtained result as the final finding. If 240 s were not perceived, patients were not included in statistical analysis. Moreover, we performed intraocular pressure and slit lamp, alternate prism cover, and fundus and refraction examinations.

All OCT measurements (Cirrus Spectral Domain OCT 4000; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) were performed after dilating patients’ pupils to at least 5-mm diameter. A single skilled ophthalmologist conducted all measurements. SD-OCT was employed to measure ONH parameters, central macular thickness (CMT), and RNFL. CMT is the average macular thickness in the 1-mm diameter in the center. The signal strength for all scans was set to six. Patients were followed on the postoperative third day, first month, second month, and third month and then every 6 months.

Patients with strabismus were followed on the third day postoperatively, first month, third month, and then every six months. Patients underwent comprehensive examination during each follow-up. All patients received stereoacuity tests and SD-OCT during all follow-up visits as a standard protocol. Details regarding patient characteristics, strabismus surgery, and HD-OCT were collected from hospital records. During follow-up visits, data were entered online using a pretested format and exported to an Excel spread sheet (Microsoft Corp.). Data were audited periodically to ensure complete data collection. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 22.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Cross tabulation and descriptive statistics were employed to compare cause and effect among different variables. Differences in mean MCT values were observed using Student’s t test and one-way ANOVA. The Pearson correlation was used to evaluate agreements between the variables. P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

3. Results

Our cohort comprised 54 patients (median: 20 years; mean age: 19.74 ± 9.26 years). Of the 54 patients, 25 (46.3%) were women and 29 (53.7%) were men (Table). The mean stereopsis was −700 ± 792.84 (median: 400) preoperatively and −573.15 ± 708.76 (median: 200; Table 2) postoperatively during the last visit. Of the 54 patients, 24 (44.4%) had amblyopia. Of the 54 patients, 25 (46.3%) were children. No significant differences were determined between the adult and pediatric populations for both eyes (p = 0.069 and p = 0.303, respectively).

Many other variables were comparable with the final postoperative RNFL value.

Age categories

Sex

Total

Female

Male

0-10

7

4

11

11-20

7

13

20

21-30

7

10

17

31-40

3

1

4

41-50

1

1

2

Total

25

29

54

Table-1 Age and sex distribution

Category

Mean

Std deviation

Median

Pre-operative central macular thickness od

226.49

39.59

226

Preoperative central macular thickness os

236.60

33.24

237.5

Pre-operative retinal nerve fibre thickness od

76.52

22.67

82

Pre-operative retinal nerve fibre thickness os

83.60

11.81

83.5

Final post-operative central macular thickness od

225.50

41.08

223.50

Final post-operative central macular thickness os

234.34

31.74

240

Final post-operative retinal nerve fibre thickness od

76.59

21.87

82

Final post-operative retinal nerve fibre thickness od

83.51

13.60

87

Table-2 Mean values of central macular thickness and retinal nerve fibre thickness pre and post treatment for both eyes

Variable-1

Variable-2

P value

Significance

Pre-operative central macular thickness od

Final post-operative central macular thickness od

0.341

No

Pre-operative central macular thickness os

Final post-operative central macular thickness os

0.167

No

Pre-operative retinal nerve fibre thickness od

Final post-operative retinal nerve fibre thickness od

0.006

Yes

Pre-operative retinal nerve fibre thickness os

Final post-operative retinal nerve fibre thickness os

0.014

Yes

Pre-operative stereopsis

Final post-operative stereopsis

0.049

Yes

Prep bcva od

Final post-operative bcva od

0.000

Yes

Pre op bcva os

Final post-operative bcva os

0.000

Yes

Table-3 comparative study of central macular thickness and retinal nerve fibre thickness pre and post treatment for both eyes

Variable-1

Variable-2

P value

Hirschberg test

RNFL OD,OS

0.363,0.313

Worth for dot test

RNFL OD,OS

0.472,0.108

Amblyopia

RNFL OD,OS

0.202,0.647

Nystagmus

RNFL OD,OS

0.153,0.151

Alternate deviation

RNFL OD,OS

0.000,0.003

Near point of Accommodation

RNFL OD,OS

0.000,0.000

Near point of Convergence

RNFL OD,OS

0.000,0.000

AC/A ratio

RNFL OD,OS

0.000,0.000

Presenting Stereopsis

RNFL OD,OS

0.927,0.645

Final stereopsis

RNFL OD,OS

0.705,0.058

Table-4 comparative study of other variables and retinal nerve fibre thickness pre and post treatment for both eyes

4. Discussion

The results revealed improvements in stereopsis and vision following strabismus treatment. Moreover, mean RNFL but not CMT exhibited significant improvement after treatment. Stereopsis indicates the vision quality [1, 2, 3, 6, and 7]. Many conditions affect stereopsis in children [2, 6, and 7]. Many methods are available to examine stereopsis [14-17]. A study indicated interpersonal differences in stereopsis measurements [18]. Another previous study compared measurements obtained using different methods (18). Stereopsis affects performance in learning, catching, and literacy [19-23]. A study revealed that stereopsis can affect movements in older patients (24, 25). Moreover, stereopsis causes a reading deficiency [26, 27].

Improvement in stereoacuity following squint management was reported [28-31]. All strabismus types exhibited improvement including esotropia, accommodative esotropia, and exotropia; this result is similar to ours [28-31].

Here, we observed increases in RNFL following improved stereoacuity and vision. No study has demonstrated this improvement. This finding suggests neuroanabolism, which refers to functional improvements in affected retinal tissue structures. Studies have examined stereoacuity and retinal cellular structures [38, 39]. Many studies examined MCT in amblyopia [39-43]. A study revealed thickness changes in anisometropic amblyopia [44]. Araki et al observed the reversal of macular changes after amblyopia management but could not find any difference [45]. Okamoto et al found improved stereoacuity and retinal microstructure after macular hole surgery [46]. A study limitation is the inclusion of a small sample with a short follow-up.

Multicenter studies including individuals of different races and ethnicities should be conducted to establish this finding. Early improvement in strabismus can improve stereoacuity, thus resulting in structural improvement.

Conclusion

Functional improvement may be associated with structural improvement following stereoacuity correction and strabismus surgery.

Conflict of interest:

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Funding Support:

No financial support was received from any company or institution. This study has not been presented at any conference or meeting. The authors have no financial interest in any aspect of this study.

References

  1. Crawford ML, von Noorden GK. "Binocular neurons and binocular function in monkeys and children." Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 24 (1983): 491-495.
  2. Heron GS. Dholakia "Stereoscopic threshold in children and adults." Am J Optom Physiol Opt 62 (1985): 505-515.
  3. Ciner EB, Ying GS. "Stereoacuity of preschool children with and without vision disorders." Optom Vis Sci 91 (2014): 351-358
  4. Rutstein RP, Fullard RJ. " Aniseikonia induced by cataract surgery and its effect on binocular vision." Optom Vis Sci 92 (2015): 201-207.
  5. Endo T, Fujikado T. "Stereoscopic perception of 3-D images by patients after surgery for esotropia." Jpn J Ophthalmol 60 (2016): 7-13.
  6. Pan CW, Chen X. "Prevalence and causes of reduced visual acuity among children aged three to six years in a metropolis in China." Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 36 (2016): 152-157.
  7. Zhu H, Yu JJ. "Association between childhood strabismus and refractive error in Chinese preschool children." PLoS One 10 (2015): e0120720
  8. Bodack MI, Chung I. "An analysis of vision screening data from New York City public schools." Optometry 81 (2010): 476-484.
  9. Wong BP, Woodsm RL. "Stereoacuity at distance and near." Optom Vis Sci 79 (2002): 771-778.
  10. Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Schneck ME. "Seeing into old age: vision function beyond acuity." Optom Vis Sci 76 (1999): 141-158.
  11. Singh D, Saxena R. "Stereoacuity changes after laser in situ keratomileusis." Optom Vis Sci 92 (2002): 196-200.
  12. Kirwan, C. and 'Keefe, "Stereopsis in refractive surgery." Am J Ophthalmol 142 (2006): 218-222.
  13. Shi M, Jiang H. "Hyperopic corneal refractive surgery in patients with accommodative esotropia and amblyopia." J Aapos 18 (2014): 316-320.
  14. Moganeswari D, Thomas J. "Test Re-Test Reliability and Validity of Different Visual Acuity and Stereoacuiety Charts Used in Preschool Children." J Clin Diagn Res 9 (2015): NC01-5.
  15. Holmes JME, Birch E. "New tests of distance stereoacuiety and their role in evaluating intermittent exotropia." Ophthalmology 114 (2007): 1215-1220.
  16. Han SB, Yang HK. "Quantification of Stereopsis in Patients with Impaired Binocularity." Optom Vis Sci 93 (2016): 588-593.
  17. Fan WC, Brown B. "A new stereo test: the double two rod test." Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 16 (2016): 196-202.
  18. Antona B, Barrio A. "Intraexaminer repeatability and agreement in stereoacuiety measurements made in young adults." Int J Ophthalmol 8 (2015): 374-381.
  19. Creavin AL, Creavin ST. "Why can't my child see 3D television?" Br J Hosp Med 75 (2014): 457-460
  20. Bogdanici ST, Costin D. "Quality of life for amblyopic children and their parents." Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 119 (2015): 214-220
  21. Ponsonby AL, Smith K. "Poor stereoacuiety among children with poor literacy: prevalence and associated factors." Optom Vis Sci 90 (2013): 75-83
  22. Livingstone MS, Lafer-Sousa R. "Stereopsis and artistic talent: poor stereopsis among art students and established artists." Psychol Sci 22 (2011): 336-338.
  23. Black A and Wood J. "Vision and falls." Clin Exp Optom 88 (2005): 212-222.
  24. Saladin JJ. "Stereopsis from a performance perspective." Optom Vis Sci 82 (2005): 186-205.
  25. Kiely PM, Crewther SG et al. "Is there an association between functional vision and learning to read?" Clin Exp Optom 84 (2001): 346-353.
  26. Palomo-Alvarez C and MC. Puell"Binocular function in school children with reading difficulties." Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248 (2010): 885-892.
  27. Noguera H, Castiella Acha JC. "Medical and surgical treatment of primary divergent strabismus." Arch Soc ESP Oftalmol 89 (2014): 431-438.
  28. Mitchell DE, MacNeill K. "Recovery of visual functions in amblyopic animals following brief exposure to total darkness." J Physiol 594 (2016): 149-167.
  29. Guclu HV. Gurlu P. "Prognostic factors for stereopsis in refractive accommodative esotropia." Pak J Med Sci 31 (2015): 807-811.
  30. Endo T, Fujikado T. "Stereoscopic perception of 3-D images by patients after surgery for esotropia." Jpn J Ophthalmol 60 (2016): 7-13
  31. Kim J, Shin HJ. "Comparison of conventional versus crossed monovision in pseudophakia." Br J Ophthalmol 99 (2015): 391-395.
  32. Mansouri B, Stacy RC. "Deprivation amblyopia and congenital hereditary cataract." Semin Ophthalmol 28 (2013): 321-326.
  33. Choi HJ, Lee JH. "Secondary intraocular lens implantation in longstanding unilateral aphakia." Optom Vis Sci 88 (2011): 608-612
  34. Kim DH, Kim JH. "Long-term results of bilateral congenital cataract treated with early cataract surgery, aphakic glasses and secondary IOL implantation." Acta Ophthalmol 90 (2012): 231-236.
  35. Hwang JM, Matsumoto ER et al. "The relationship between stereopsis and monocular optokinetic optokinetic nystagmus after infantile cataracts." J Aapos 3 (1999): 221-226.
  36. Wright KW. "Pediatric cataracts." Curr Opin Ophthalmol 8 (1997): 50-55.
  37. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC et al. "Encoding of binocular disparity by simple cells in the cat's visual cortex." J Neurophysiol 75 (1996): 1779-805.
  38. Johnston A. "A spatial property of the retino-cortical mapping." Spat Vis 1 (1986): 319-331.
  39. Shen Y, Zhao J, Sun L, et al. The long-term observation in Chinese children with monocular myelinated retinal nerve fibers, myopia and amblyopia. Transl Pediatr 10 (2021): 860-869.
  40. Repka MX, Kraker RT, Tamkins SM, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in amblyopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 148 (2009):143-147.
  41. Jun JH, Lee SY. The effects of optic disc factors on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement in children. Korean J Ophthalmol 22 (2008):115-122.
  42. Szigeti A, Tátrai E, Szamosi A et al. A morphological study of retinal changes in unilateral amblyopia using optical coherence tomography image segmentation. PLoS One 9 (2014): e88363.
  43. Masri OS, Abiad B, Darwich MJ, et al. Morphological changes in amblyopic eyes in choriocapillaris and Sattler's layer in comparison to healthy eyes, and in retinal nerve fiber layer in comparison to fellow eyes through quantification of mean reflectivity: A pilot study. PLoS One 16 (2021): e0255735.
  44. Miki A, Shirakashi M, Yaoeda K et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in recovered and persistent amblyopia. Clin Ophthalmol 4 (2010):1061-1064.
  45. Chen W, Xu J, Zhou J et al. Thickness of retinal layers in the foveas of children with anisometropic amblyopia. PLoS One 12 (2017): e0174537.
  46. Araki S, Miki A, Goto K, et al. Macular retinal and choroidal thickness in unilateral amblyopia using swept-source optical coherence tomography. BMC Ophthalmol 17 (2017):167.
  47. Okamoto F, Moriya Y, Sugiura Y, et al. Stereopsis and retinal microstructures following macular hole surgery. Sci Rep 10 (2020): 19534.

    Editor In Chief

    Dr. Jui-Teng Lin

  • New Vision Inc
    Taipei, Taiwan

© 2016-2022, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved!