A Step-by-Step Evaluation of the Claim That COVID-19 Vaccines Saved Millions of Lives

Author(s): Yaakov Ophir, Yaffa Shir-Raz, Shay Zakov, Raphael Lataster, Peter A. McCullough

Concerns about potential harms of COVID-19 vaccines are often met with the widespread claim that the vaccines saved millions of lives. A recent U.S. Senate hearing on vaccine safety (May 21, 2025) even opened with the declaration that “there is no scientific question about that fact.” This article offers a structured, step-by-step evaluation of the empirical basis for that claim, building on the authors’ prior comprehensive investigation. Step 1 analyzes the mathematical models behind the ‘millions saved’ claim, including the one cited in the Senate hearing. Step 2 revisits the collapse of the initial narrative concerning vaccine efficacy against infection and transmission, which served as the cornerstone of the mass vaccination campaign. Step 3 examines the revised justification that followed: the claim that vaccines continued to protect against severe illness and death. This step draws on data from randomized trials (3.1), observational studies (3.2), and official public health dashboards (3.3). Taken together, this analysis shows that the ‘millions saved’ narrative lacks empirical support (readers are strongly encouraged to consult the full article and assess the evidence). To understand how such an unsupported narrative could emerge and dominate, Step 4 traces the direct mechanisms behind its rise: methodological flaws (4.1), misrepresentation and misinterpretation of findings (4.2, 4.3), and suppression of dissenting voices (4.4). By focusing on transient signals of success while overlooking concerns about efficacy and safety, a fragile assertion appears to have solidified into a widely accepted belief that shaped global health policy.