Nikita¹, Nikhil Payal^2*, Nidhi Bedi³, Mukesh Sharma⁴, Manisha Khandait⁵

¹PhD Medical Microbiology Scholar, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, SGT University & Hospital, Budhera, Gurugram-Badli Road, Gurugram, Haryana, India

²PhD Medical Microbiology, Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, SGT University & Hospital, Budhera, Gurugram-Badli Road, Gurugram, Haryana, India

³MD Pediatrics, Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, SGT University & Hospital, Budhera, Gurugram-Badli Road, Gurugram, Haryana, India

⁴MD Microbiology, Additional Dean & Professor, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Department of Microbiology, SGT University & Hospital, Budhera, Gurugram-Badli Road, Gurugram, Haryana, India

⁵MD Microbiology, Head & Professor, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Department of Microbiology, SGT University & Hospital, Budhera, Gurugram-Badli Road, Gurugram, Haryana, India

*Corresponding author: Nikhil Payal, PhD Medical Microbiology Scholar, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, SGT University & Hospital, Budhera, Gurugram-Badli Road, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

Received: 19 January 2025; Accepted: 27 January 2025; Published: 07 February 2025

Article Information

Citation: Nikita, Nikhil Payal, Nidhi Bedi, Mukesh Sharma, Manisha Khandait. Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention Strategies for Neonatal Sepsis: A Review. Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research. 9 (2025): 28-34.

DOI: 10.26502/acbr.50170431

Abstract

Keywords

Neonatal sepsis; Child mortality India; Maternal health; Prenatal care; Socio-economic disparities; Antibiotic stewardship; Multidrug resistant organisms

Article Details

1. Introduction

Sepsis is one of the primary causes of mortality and morbidity in newborns worldwide [1], posing a significant health burden. In middle- and low-income countries, neonatal sepsis leads to distressing outcomes [2]. Neonatal sepsis accounts for nearly 203,000 deaths annually, with approximately 1.3 million cases reported globally [3], causing a significant financial burden [4]. The prevalence of sepsis is notably higher in preterm and low-weight newborns, with a reported mortality rate of 17.6% [5]. Studies have observed that 24% of these cases are caused by severe infections [6].

In high-income countries (HIC), neonatal sepsis is well-studied and documented. However, there is a lack of information on its incidence in low- and middle-income countries (LIC and MIC) [7,8]. Neonatal sepsis is a systemic infection caused by invading microorganisms during the first four weeks of life [9]. It encompasses conditions such as bloodstream infections (septicemia), pneumonia, meningitis, and other widespread infections. Diagnosing sepsis in neonates is particularly challenging because, unlike in older children and adults, its symptoms are often vague and non-specific [10]. During neonatal period, newborns may experience health issues resulting from birth and labor trauma. Research has revealed several factors associated with an increased risk of neonatal sepsis, including low birth weight, preterm birth (before 37 weeks of gestation), premature rupture of membranes (PROM), complications during labor such as perinatal asphyxia, low socioeconomic conditions, poor sanitation, poor maternal nutritional status, and suboptimal infection control practices [1,6,11,12].

Neonatal sepsis is categorized into two types on the basis of manifestation of clinical symptoms: Early-onset sepsis (EOS); Occurring within the first 72 hours of life, caused by microorganisms transmitted vertically from mother to infant and Late-onset sepsis (LOS); Occurring in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) infants after the first 72 hours of life [12,13]. The primary diagnostic method for sepsis involves traditional blood cultures, which classify sepsis into two main categories: 'culture-positive' sepsis, where one or more pathogens are identified, and 'culture-negative' sepsis, where no pathogens are detected, but clinical symptoms and/or additional laboratory findings suggest the presence of sepsis [14,15]. In the urban conglomerate of Delhi NCR, the challenges are compounded by population density, diverse socio-economic conditions, and varying levels of healthcare access and quality. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of neonatal sepsis, focusing on its pathophysiology, risk factors, bacterial profiles, and management strategies. It highlights the significant burden of neonatal sepsis and explores the various factors contributing to its prevalence and management challenges.

2. Review

2.1 Epidemiology

In high-income countries (HIC), the occurrence of neonatal sepsis is estimated to range from 1 to 8 cases per 1,000 live births, with a mortality rate of 14 per 100,000 live births [16,17]. According to the investigators of the DeNIS study, the incidence of neonatal sepsis in Indian public sector hospitals is approximately 14.3%, of which 6.2% of cases were culture-positive. Additionally, 83% of the episodes were early-onset sepsis (EOS). It was found that the overall mortality in culture-positive sepsis, culture-negative sepsis, and meningitis is around 25.6%. Chaurasia et al. reported that the incidence of culture-positive sepsis in South Asia is approximately 15.7%, with a case fatality rate of 34.4%, which is 2 to 3 times higher than in the UK and USA [18]. 

When comparing the incidence of sepsis in HICs to that in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), it has been observed that morbidity and mortality are significantly higher in LMICs. The factors contributing to these substantial differences include insufficient essential equipment and supplies, such as soap, sinks, running water, and disposables; overcrowding and staff shortages; and inadequate disinfection practices [1,19]. 

2.2 Pathophysiology

Neonatal sepsis is a clinical syndrome defined by the presence of infection-related signs and symptoms, often accompanied by bacteraemia, leading to a systemic inflammatory response and eventually resulting in multiorgan dysfunction [20]. Oranges et al. [21] and Wynn and Wong [22], studied that the skin creates physical barrier from the environment and the body but the stratum which is the outer layer of epidermis is not well developed till 10 days of birth and vernix which is complex natural material present on the skin can act as a barrier but is absent in preterm neonates which makes new-borns susceptible to sepsis [21,22].  Both early and late onset of sepsis have different microbial profile, while the former was supposed to be caused by Group B Streptococcus (GBS), Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes, infection in the foetus occurs through vertical transmission of maternal bacteria from the lower genital tract to the uterus. This results in contamination of the amniotic fluid, leading to hematogenous spread, which causes fetal bacteremia and sepsis [3], while the later was observed to be caused by ESKAPE pathogens which are horizontally transferred from hospital environment [1,23].

The pathogenesis of neonatal sepsis is influenced by several maternal and neonatal risk factors.

Maternal Risk Factors: Maternal infections, such as chorioamnionitis, urinary tract infections (UTIs), and GBS colonization, increase the likelihood of transmitting pathogens to the neonate. Other maternal conditions like premature rupture of membranes, premature labor, and low socioeconomic status have also been identified as major risk factors for neonatal sepsis [24,25]. A study conducted by Raturi A and Chandran S highlighted that prolonged rupture of membranes exceeding 18 hours, chorioamnionitis or intra-amniotic infection, and maternal infections (primarily urinary tract infections followed by vulvovaginitis) during pregnancy are significant risk factors to take into account [17]. Other studies also suggest the same [26,27]. Salama and Tharwat [28] Showed that primiparous mother are at a higher risk having neonatal sepsis than multiparous mothers, neonates delivered through C-section are at a 2.5 times high risk than neonates born vaginally [28]. 

Neonatal Risk Factors:  Salama and Tharwat [28] showed that Premature birth (<37 weeks’ gestation) increases the risk of neonatal sepsis 3.4 times than the full term neonate, males are at 1.7 times higher risk to develop neonatal sepsis than females low birth weight (LBW) increases the risk to 3.5 times, and congenital anomalies place neonates at increased risk due to their underdeveloped immune systems. Premature neonates are particularly susceptible to infections, as their immune responses are not fully matured, and their exposure to invasive medical procedures such as intubation and catheterization increases the risk of nosocomial infections [28-31]. 

Once pathogens enter the neonate's bloodstream, they may spread to various organs, causing symptoms in multiple systems, including gastrointestinal, urological, cardiovascular, metabolic, and central nervous systems. The systemic inflammatory response leads to clinical manifestations such as fever, lethargy, respiratory distress, and poor feeding, which can progress to severe sepsis and multiorgan failure in extreme cases [20]. 

3. Risk Factors Associated with Neonatal Sepsis

Neonatal sepsis is a multifactorial condition, and its occurrence is influenced by a range of maternal, neonatal, and healthcare-related risk factors Multiple studies have established that neonatal sepsis involves both neonatal and maternal risk factors. This is further corroborated by evidence from a systematic review article [32].

3.1 Maternal Risk Factors

Prolonged rupture of membranes (PROM): The risk of neonatal infection increases when the membranes rupture more than 18 hours before delivery, allowing bacteria to ascend from the vaginal canal into the amniotic sac. This significantly raises the risk of early-onset neonatal sepsis [33,34]. A study conducted a meta-analysis examining three factors: gestational age, mode of delivery, and premature rupture of membranes (PROM). The analysis revealed that gestational age less than 37 weeks (OR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.40–2.99; I² = 77%) and PROM (OR: 11.14; 95% CI: 5.54–22.38; I² = 0) were significantly associated with increased odds of neonatal sepsis [12]. Another study supports that maternal factor, including preterm delivery (gestational age <37 weeks) and premature rupture of membranes (PROM), are significant risk factors for neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS). A meta-analysis reported an odds ratio (OR) of 2.3 (95% CI: 1.0–5.4; I² = 93.4%) for preterm delivery and an adjusted odd ratio (aOR) of 4.9 (95% CI: 1.9–12.8) for PROM [35,36], found out that the patient having PROM >18 hours are at 5 times higher risk of developing sepsis and the data was found to be consistent with the other studies, prolonged PROM leads the microbe to enter the amniotic sac and predisposes neonate to infection [37].

Urinary Tract Infection (UTI): UTI is common health issue during pregnancy with high prevalence rate in LMIC and leads to maternal and neonatal health problems all over the globe, it has been implicated to cause premature birth, perinatal death, it has been observed that maternal UTI increases the risk of neonatal UTI almost 5 times [38].

Chorioamnionitis and Intrapartum Fever: Chorioamnionitis and Intrapartum fever indicates the infections that can transfer to neonate while delivery study revealed that neonates whose mothers experienced a fever during labor had 3.42 times greater odds of developing sepsis compared to those born to mothers without a fever during labor [39,40].

Premature labor: Infants born prematurely (<37 weeks) are highly susceptible to infections due to their immature immune systems and the need for invasive procedures during hospitalization. Meta-analyses identified several risk factors for neonatal sepsis, including male sex (OR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.02–1.68), being out born (OR: 5.5; 95% CI: 2.39–12.49), need for artificial ventilation (OR: 5.61; 95% CI: 8.21–41.18), gestational age less than 37 weeks (OR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.40–2.99), and premature rupture of membranes (OR: 11.14; 95% CI: 5.54–22.38) [32].

Socio-economic status: Low socio-economic status has been linked to poor prenatal care and increased maternal infections, further elevating the risk of neonatal sepsis [32,33]. Reviews have highlighted that maternal colonization or infection, prolonged rupture of membranes exceeding 18 hours, and the use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis significantly increase the risk of early-onset neonatal infections (EOS). Neonates are particularly vulnerable to EOS, which can result from the direct transmission of maternal colonizers, such as bacteria from the maternal vaginal tract, to the newborn during delivery [41,42].

3.2 Neonatal Risk Factors

Low birth weight (LBW): Infants weighing less than 2.5 kg at birth are more vulnerable to sepsis due to their underdeveloped immune systems and the increased likelihood of requiring invasive interventions. A study conducted by Murthy et al. [12], concluded that birthweight and gestational age at delivery were the most commonly reported factors associated with neonatal outcomes [24].  Ganfure and Lencha showed that neonate with birthweight >2.5 kg have 6 times higher chances of developing sepsis than normal birth weight [43].

Low APGAR Score: Studies associated with APGAR scores discovered that low first minute APGAR will increase the risk of sepsis by 3.33 times and low APGAR score in 5 minute will increase the risk by 4 times [44-46].

Prematurity: Premature infants are at high risk of infection due to their underdeveloped immune responses and prolonged hospital stays, which increase exposure to nosocomial pathogens [25]. 

3.3 Hospital-Related Risk Factors

Infection control practices: Inadequate sterilization of medical equipment and inconsistent hygiene practices in NICUs are significant contributors to the incidence of hospital-acquired infections. Poor adherence to infection control protocols often leads to nosocomial neonatal sepsis, particularly in low-resource settings like India [47].

Antibiotic resistance: The overuse and misuse of antibiotics in NICUs contribute to the growing problem of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms, which complicate the management of neonatal sepsis. The study from Gupta S et al. [48], also identified a significant prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria contributed significantly to the rising sepsis rates. Studies by Mohakud et al. [49] and Sethi et al. [13] also highlight and emphasize the prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms in sepsis and the associated mortality risk.

3.4 Bacteriological Profile

Early-Onset Sepsis (EOS): The predominant pathogens for EOS are Group B Streptococcus (GBS), Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella species. These organisms are typically acquired from the maternal genital tract during delivery [24].

Late-Onset Sepsis (LOS): LOS, occurring after 72 hours of life, is often associated with hospital-acquired infections. Common pathogens include Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CONS), Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter species. Increasing prevalence of MDR organisms has become a growing concern, emphasizing the need for stringent infection control measures in NICUs [25]. 

Study done by Vimal (2024) emphasized the role of multidrug-resistant pathogens, such as Klebsiella and Escherichia coli, in complicating the treatment of neonatal sepsis in Indian hospitals. This aligns with findings from Gupta S et al. [48], who noted that coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most common bacterial isolates associated with neonatal sepsis.

Additionally, Studies by Mohakud et al. [49] and Sethi et al. [13] highlight Staphylococcus aureus as the predominant pathogen in sepsis, followed by Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Enterococcus spp. among Gram-positive isolates. Gram-negative pathogens, including E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, were also significant, with high resistance to ampicillin and 68% resistance to cephalosporins. These studies reinforce the need for early detection, proper management, and improved infection control practices to reduce neonatal sepsis mortality in this region [13,49].

The epidemiology and risk factors associated with neonatal sepsis in Delhi NCR align with findings from several studies, highlighting the major burden of this condition. Studies have identified key risk factors, including preterm birth, low birth weight, and maternal infections such as GBS colonization and chorioamnionitis. These risk factors, combined with inadequate prenatal care and poor infection control practices, contribute to the high incidence of neonatal sepsis in the region.

4. Management Strategies

Effective management of neonatal sepsis requires a multifaceted approach that includes prompt diagnosis, appropriate antimicrobial therapy, and comprehensive infection control measures.

4.1 Early Diagnosis: Prompt identification of neonatal sepsis is crucial for improving outcomes. Common clinical signs include fever, respiratory distress, lethargy, and poor feeding. Laboratory tests such as blood cultures, C-reactive protein (CRP), and complete blood count (CBC) can aid in diagnosis. However, culture results may take time, so empirical antibiotic therapy is often initiated based on clinical suspicion until results are available [25]. A study by Arup Jana highlighted significant cross-state disparities in the prevalence of low birth weight (LBW) and preterm birth (PTB) in India, with 12% of children being LBW and 18% PTB during 2019–21. Maternal factors, including inadequate antenatal care, prior cesarean delivery, and maternal short stature, were positively associated with these adverse outcomes. Interestingly, some correlates were found to influence PTB and LBW differently, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to address regional and maternal disparities in birth outcomes [50]. A study by the National Neonatology Forum (NNF) India highlights the importance of early diagnosis and appropriate management of neonatal sepsis. It emphasizes the use of timely blood cultures and biomarkers for more accurate sepsis diagnosis. It also stresses the significance of improving maternal care, proper hygiene, and timely interventions in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) to reduce the burden of neonatal sepsis [51].  Collectively, these studies emphasize the role of timely diagnosis, appropriate antibiotic therapy, and prevention strategies such as improved antenatal care and hospital hygiene in reducing the impact of neonatal sepsis.

4.2 Antibiotic Therapy: Empirical antibiotic therapy should target the most common pathogens identified in the specific setting. In India, where Gram-negative organisms like E. coli and Klebsiella are prevalent, broad-spectrum antibiotics such as ampicillin and gentamicin are typically used which is mentioned in the WHO’s access category as the first line antibiotics for EOS, while vancomycin or linezolid may be added for suspected nosocomial infections in LOS cases [20,52]. The emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens highlights the importance of continuous surveillance and antibiotic stewardship programs to minimize resistance and improve outcomes [53]. A study by Sachan et al. [54] on 332 neonates found that 89 were diagnosed with clinical sepsis, with 64.9% presenting with early onset sepsis. Notably, 68.5% of these neonates had a birth weight of less than 2.5 kg, a key risk factor identified in multiple studies. The study also revealed that Gram-positive organisms were sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid, while Gram-negative organisms showed resistance to common antibiotics such as cephalosporins and piperacillin-tazobactam [54]. This underscores the importance of antibiotic resistance in neonatal sepsis in the region, as similarly observed by Jatsho et al. [55], who found a high resistance to carbapenems in Acinetobacter species, with a mortality rate of 88.9% in cases of Gram-negative sepsis [55]. These studies emphasize the importance of infection control practices and antibiotic stewardship to mitigate these risks.

4.3 Infection Control: Stringent infection control measures are critical in reducing the incidence of neonatal sepsis, particularly in NICUs. Regular hand hygiene, proper sterilization of medical equipment, and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) are essential. Additionally, infection control protocols should be strictly adhered to, with regular audits and training for healthcare providers [47]. 

4.4 Antibiotic Stewardship: Antibiotic stewardship programs are designed to optimize the use of antibiotics in healthcare settings, minimizing the risk of resistance. In NICUs, these programs involve guidelines for empirical therapy, de-escalation of treatment based on culture results, and monitoring of local resistance patterns [56]. Such programs can significantly reduce the incidence of MDR infections in neonatal sepsis cases.

4.5 Prenatal Care: Improving prenatal care is essential in reducing the incidence of neonatal sepsis. Routine screening for maternal infections such as UTIs, GBS, and chorioamnionitis can significantly reduce the risk of early-onset sepsis. Educating expectant mothers about the importance of prenatal care and institutional deliveries is critical for early detection and prevention of maternal infections [57,58].

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, a multi-pronged approach focusing on improving maternal health, strengthening infection control in healthcare settings, and enhancing public health awareness is crucial in reducing neonatal sepsis in Delhi NCR. Despite advancements in healthcare, factors such as inadequate prenatal care, socioeconomic disparities, and inconsistent infection control practices continue to contribute to high rates of neonatal sepsis. Effective prevention and management require a multifaceted approach, including enhanced prenatal care, strict adherence to infection control protocols, and the implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs. Moreover, strengthening healthcare infrastructure, particularly in peripheral hospitals, and promoting regular training for healthcare providers are essential for improving outcomes. Government initiatives and collaborations with private healthcare providers and NGOs can further bridge the gaps in healthcare delivery, ensuring that all new-borns receive the care they need to thrive. Addressing these challenges holistically will be vital in reducing the burden of neonatal sepsis and improving neonatal health outcomes across regions.

Funding:

NIL

Acknowledgement:

NIL

Conflict of Interest:

NIL

References

1. Agarwal R, Chaurasia S, Jeeva Sankar M, et al. Characterisation and antimicrobial resistance of sepsis pathogens in neonates born in tertiary care centres in Delhi, India: a cohort study. Lancet Glob Health 4 (2016): e752-60.
2. Deress T, Belay G, Ayenew G, et al. Bacterial profiles and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns in neonatal sepsis at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia. Front Microbiol 15 (2024): 1461689.
3. Mahmoud HAH, Parekh R, Dhandibhotla S, et al. Insight into Neonatal Sepsis: An Overview. Cureus 15 (2023): e45530.
4. Ranjeva SL, Warf BC, Schiff SJ. Economic burden of neonatal sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa. BMJ Glob Health 3 (2018): e000347.
5. Global report on the epidemiology and burden of sepsis: current evidence, identifying gaps and future directions 55 (2020).
6. Milton R, Gillespie D, Dyer C, et al. Neonatal sepsis and mortality in low-income and middle-income countries from a facility-based birth cohort: an international multisite prospective observational study. Lancet Glob Health 10 (2022): e661.
7. Rudd KE, Kissoon N, Limmathurotsakul Di, et al. The global burden of sepsis: barriers and potential solutions. Crit Care 22 (2018): 123305059.
8. Taylor AW, Blau DM, Bassat Q, et al. Initial findings from a novel population-based child mortality surveillance approach: a descriptive study. Lancet Glob Health 8 (2020): e909-19.
9. Jihwaprani MC, Sula I, Coha D, et al. Bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of common neonatal sepsis pathogens in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Qatar Med J 62 (2024).
10. Geleta D, Abebe G, Tilahun T, et al. Prevalence and pathogen profiles of bacteremia in neonates hospitalized for clinical Sepsis in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 24 (2024): 1424.
11. Bohanon FJ, Lopez ON, Adhikari D, et al. Race, Income and Insurance Status Affect Neonatal Sepsis Mortality and Healthcare Resource Utilization. Pediatr Infect Dis J 37 (2018): E178-84.
12. Murthy S, Godinho MA, Guddattu V, et al. Risk factors of neonatal sepsis in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 14 (2019): e0215683.
13. Sethi K, Verma RK, Yadav RK, et al. A study on bacteriological profile in suspected cases of neonatal sepsis and its correlation with various biomarkers in the rural population of a university hospital. J Family Med Prim Care 12 (2023): 2313.
14. Celik IH, Hanna M, Canpolat FE, et al. Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: The Past, Present and Future. Pediatr Res 91 (2021): 337.
15. Eichberger J, Resch E, Resch B. Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: The Role of Inflammatory Markers. Front Pediatr 10 (2022): 840288.
16. Ely DM, Driscoll AK, Mathews TJ. Infant Mortality by Age at Death in the United States, 2016 Key findings Data from the National Vital Statistics System (2016).
17. Raturi A, Chandran S. Neonatal Sepsis: Aetiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Advances and Management Strategies. Clin Med Insights Pediatr 18 (2024): 11795565241281336.
18. Zaidi AKM, Huskins WC, Thaver D, et al. Goldmann DA. Hospital-acquired neonatal infections in developing countries. Lancet 365 (2005): 1175-88.
19. Chaurasia S, Sivanandan S, Agarwal R, et al. Neonatal sepsis in South Asia: huge burden and spiralling antimicrobial resistance. The BMJ 364 (2019): k5314.
20. Conti MG, Angelidou A, Diray-Arce J, et al. Immunometabolic approaches to prevent, detect, and treat neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Res 87 (2020): 399-405.
21. Oranges T, Dini V, Romanelli M. Skin Physiology of the Neonate and Infant: Clinical Implications. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 4 (2015): 587.
22. Wynn JL, Wong HR. Pathophysiology of Neonatal Sepsis. Fetal and Neonatal Physiology 1536 (2016).
23. Miranda S, Harahap A, Husada D, et al. Microbial Pattern of Neonatal Sepsis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of dr. Ramelan Navy Central Hospital. Int J Pediatr (2024): 6264980.
24. El-Mashad SM, Hamam SM, El-Farargy MS, et al. Incidence of Neonatal Sepsis and the Causative Organisms in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Tanta University Hospital. Med J Cairo Univ 87 (2019): 5323-32.
25. Sinha AK, Murthy V, Nath P, et al. Prevention of Late Onset Sepsis and Central-line Associated Blood Stream Infection in Preterm Infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 35 (2016): 401-6.
26. Paul SP, Khattak H, Kini PK, et al. NICE guideline review: neonatal infection: antibiotics for prevention and treatment (NG195). Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 107 (2022).
27. Araújo BC, Guimarães H. Risk factors for neonatal sepsis: an overview. Journal of Pediatric and Neonatal Individualized Medicine (JPNIM) 9 (2020): e090206-e090206.
28. Salama B, Tharwat EM. A case control study of maternal and neonatal risk factors associated with neonatal sepsis. J Public Health Res 12 (2023): 22799036221150556.
29. Chakraborty RK, Burns B. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. StatPearls (2023).
30. Lawrence SM, Ruoss JL, Wynn JL. IL-17 in Neonatal Health and Disease. Am J Reprod Immunol 79 (2017): e12800.
31. Sun Y, Li L, Song J, et al. Intrauterine Hypoxia Changed the Colonization of the Gut Microbiota in Newborn Rats. Front Pediatr 9 (2021): 675022.
32. Murthy S, Godinho MA, Guddattu V, et al. Risk factors of neonatal sepsis in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 14 (2019): e0215683.
33. Cortese F, Scicchitano P, Gesualdo M, et al. Early and Late Infections in Newborns: Where Do We Stand? A Review. Pediatr Neonatol 57 (2016): 265-73.
34. Dayal S, Jenkins SM, Hong PL. Preterm and Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes (PPROM and PROM). StatPearls (2024).
35. Chan GJ, Lee AC, Baqui AH, et al. Risk of early-onset neonatal infection with maternal infection or colonization: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 10 (2013).
36. Shifera N, Dejenie F, Mesafint G, et al. Risk factors for neonatal sepsis among neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital and Adare General Hospital in Hawassa City, Ethiopia. Front Pediatr 11 (2023): 1092671.
37. Adatara P, Afaya A, Salia SM, et al. Risk Factors Associated with Neonatal Sepsis: A Case Study at a Specialist Hospital in Ghana. ScientificWorldJournal (2019).
38. Khalesi N, Khosravi N, Jalali A, et al. Evaluation of Maternal Urinary Tract Infection as a Potential Risk Factor for Neonatal Urinary Tract Infection. J Family Reprod Health 8 (2014): 59.
39. Gebremedhin D, Berhe H, Gebrekirstos K. Risk Factors for Neonatal Sepsis in Public Hospitals of Mekelle City, North Ethiopia, 2015: Unmatched Case Control Study 11 (2016): e0154798.
40. Beck C, Gallagher K, Taylor LA, et al. Chorioamnionitis and Risk for Maternal and Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstetrics and gynecology 137 (2021): 1007.
41. Panigrahi P, Chandel DS, Hansen NI, et al. Neonatal sepsis in rural India: timing, microbiology and antibiotic resistance in a population-based prospective study in the community setting. J Perinatol 37 (2017): 911-21.
42. Russell NJ, Seale AC, O’Sullivan C, et al. Risk of Early-Onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease with Maternal Colonization Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. Clin Infect Dis 65 (2017): S152-9.
43. Ganfure G, Lencha B. Sepsis Risk Factors in Neonatal Intensive Care Units of Public Hospitals in Southeast Ethiopia, 2020: A Retrospective Unmatched Case-Control Study. Int J Pediatr 2023 (2023): 3088642.
44. Alemayehu A, Alemayehu M, Arba A, et al. Predictors of Neonatal Sepsis in Hospitals at Wolaita Sodo Town, Southern Ethiopia: Institution-Based Unmatched Case-Control Study Int J Pediatr (2020): 3709672.
45. Seyoum K, Sahiledengle B, Kene C, et al. Determinants of neonatal sepsis among neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units in ethiopian hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon 9 (2023): e20336.
46. Yismaw AE, Abebil TY, Biweta MA, et al. Proportion of neonatal sepsis and determinant factors among neonates admitted in University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital neonatal Intensive care unit Northwest Ethiopia 2017. BMC Res Notes 12 (2019).
47. Kallimath A, Patnaik SK, Malshe N, et al. Quality improvement initiative ‘S-A-F-H’ to reduce healthcare-associated neonatal sepsis in a tertiary neonatal care unit. BMJ Open Qual 13 (2024).
48. Gupta S, Singh VK, Singhal S, et al. Neonatal sepsis in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi, India: study of microbial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. Int J Contemp Pediatrics 6 (2019): 384-9.
49. Mohakud NK, Mishra JP, Nayak MK, et al. Bacteriological Profile and Outcome of Culture-Positive Neonatal Sepsis in a Special Newborn Care Unit Setting, Odisha. Cureus 14 (2022).
50. Jana A. Correlates of low birth weight and preterm birth in India. PLoS One 18 (2023): e0287919.
51. Anne RP, Rameshbabu M, Dutta S, et al. Diagnosis and Management of Neonatal Sepsis Guideline Writing Group (Alphabetical) (2025).
52. Guideline: Managing Possible Serious Bacterial Infection in Young Infants When Referral Is Not Feasible - PubMed (2025).
53. Korang SK, Safi S, Gluud C, et al. Antibiotic regimens for neonatal sepsis - a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis. Syst Rev 8 (2019).
54. Sachan D, Kharya P, Bajpai PK. Characteristics of neonatal sepsis at a tertiary care centre in Western Uttar Pradesh, India: a hospital based retrospective study. Int J Community Med Public 9 (2022): 4086-90.
55. Jatsho J, Nishizawa Y, Pelzom D, et al. Clinical and Bacteriological Profile of Neonatal Sepsis: A Prospective Hospital-Based Study. Int J Pediatr (2020).
56. Mtitimila EI, Cooke RWI. Antibiotic regimens for suspected early neonatal sepsis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 18 (2004).
57. Habak PJ, Carlson K, Griggs, Jr RP. Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnancy. StatPearls (2024).
58. Serra G, Scalzo L Lo, Giordano M, et al. Group B streptococcus colonization in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a three-year monocentric retrospective study during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Ital J Pediatr 50 (2024): 175.