Abstracting and Indexing

  • PubMed NLM
  • Google Scholar
  • CrossRef
  • WorldCat
  • ResearchGate
  • Academic Keys
  • DRJI
  • Microsoft Academic
  • Academia.edu
  • OpenAIRE

The Effect of Replacing Dried Meal Worm With Soybean Meal on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Broiler Chickens

Article Information

Naderiboroojerdi N*, Rajabzadeh M

Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Birjand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Birjand, Iran

*Corresponding Author: Navid Naderiboroojerdi. Master of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Birjand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Birjand, Iran

Received: 31 August 2022; Accepted: 09 September 2022; Published: 14 September 2022

Citation: Naderiboroojerdi N and Rajabzadeh M. The Effect of Replacing Dried Meal Worm With Soybean Meal on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Broiler Chickens. Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research 5 (2022): 634-641.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook

Abstract

An experiment was conducted on 240 one-day old male (Ross308) chicken to the effect of substitution of dried mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) with soybean meal on growth performance and carcass characteristics broiler chicks. Chicks fed in a completely randomized design with 4 replicate cages (12 birds per cage). Five dietary treatments used: 1- Control treatment: Basal diet based on corn-soybean meal without adding dried mealworm, 2- Replacement of 5% dried mealworm with soybean meal in the base diet, 3- Replacement of 10% dried mealworm with soybean meal in the base diet, 4- Replacement of 15% dried mealworm with soybean meal in the base diet and 5- Replacement of 20% dried mealworm with soybean meal in the base diet. The results of the experiment showed that 3rd and 4th treatments with a substitution of 10 and 15 percent showed a higher mean weight gain and a daily gain, but their feed intake was lower comparing other treatments, and finally, the feed conversion ratio showed a significant decrease with respect to control treatment using these replacement levels. At 21 and 42 days of age, carcass yield and relative weight of the breasts showed significant increases in treatments 3 and 4, and other characteristics of chicken carcasses were not affected by the test treatments. The experiment showed that replacing soybean meal with 10% and 15% worm powder significantly improved the performance of broiler chickens, but no significant difference was found between the two levels.

Keywords

Broiler chickens, Carcass characteristics, Dried mealworm, Soybean meal

Broiler chickens articles; Carcass characteristics articles; Dried mealworm articles; Soybean meal articles

Broiler chickens articles Broiler chickens Research articles Broiler chickens review articles Broiler chickens PubMed articles Broiler chickens PubMed Central articles Broiler chickens 2023 articles Broiler chickens 2024 articles Broiler chickens Scopus articles Broiler chickens impact factor journals Broiler chickens Scopus journals Broiler chickens PubMed journals Broiler chickens medical journals Broiler chickens free journals Broiler chickens best journals Broiler chickens top journals Broiler chickens free medical journals Broiler chickens famous journals Broiler chickens Google Scholar indexed journals Carcass characteristics articles Carcass characteristics Research articles Carcass characteristics review articles Carcass characteristics PubMed articles Carcass characteristics PubMed Central articles Carcass characteristics 2023 articles Carcass characteristics 2024 articles Carcass characteristics Scopus articles Carcass characteristics impact factor journals Carcass characteristics Scopus journals Carcass characteristics PubMed journals Carcass characteristics medical journals Carcass characteristics free journals Carcass characteristics best journals Carcass characteristics top journals Carcass characteristics free medical journals Carcass characteristics famous journals Carcass characteristics Google Scholar indexed journals Dried mealworm articles Dried mealworm Research articles Dried mealworm review articles Dried mealworm PubMed articles Dried mealworm PubMed Central articles Dried mealworm 2023 articles Dried mealworm 2024 articles Dried mealworm Scopus articles Dried mealworm impact factor journals Dried mealworm Scopus journals Dried mealworm PubMed journals Dried mealworm medical journals Dried mealworm free journals Dried mealworm best journals Dried mealworm top journals Dried mealworm free medical journals Dried mealworm famous journals Dried mealworm Google Scholar indexed journals Soybean meal articles Soybean meal Research articles Soybean meal review articles Soybean meal PubMed articles Soybean meal PubMed Central articles Soybean meal 2023 articles Soybean meal 2024 articles Soybean meal Scopus articles Soybean meal impact factor journals Soybean meal Scopus journals Soybean meal PubMed journals Soybean meal medical journals Soybean meal free journals Soybean meal best journals Soybean meal top journals Soybean meal free medical journals Soybean meal famous journals Soybean meal Google Scholar indexed journals diets  articles diets  Research articles diets  review articles diets  PubMed articles diets  PubMed Central articles diets  2023 articles diets  2024 articles diets  Scopus articles diets  impact factor journals diets  Scopus journals diets  PubMed journals diets  medical journals diets  free journals diets  best journals diets  top journals diets  free medical journals diets  famous journals diets  Google Scholar indexed journals livestock  articles livestock  Research articles livestock  review articles livestock  PubMed articles livestock  PubMed Central articles livestock  2023 articles livestock  2024 articles livestock  Scopus articles livestock  impact factor journals livestock  Scopus journals livestock  PubMed journals livestock  medical journals livestock  free journals livestock  best journals livestock  top journals livestock  free medical journals livestock  famous journals livestock  Google Scholar indexed journals poultry feed  articles poultry feed  Research articles poultry feed  review articles poultry feed  PubMed articles poultry feed  PubMed Central articles poultry feed  2023 articles poultry feed  2024 articles poultry feed  Scopus articles poultry feed  impact factor journals poultry feed  Scopus journals poultry feed  PubMed journals poultry feed  medical journals poultry feed  free journals poultry feed  best journals poultry feed  top journals poultry feed  free medical journals poultry feed  famous journals poultry feed  Google Scholar indexed journals bird growth articles bird growth Research articles bird growth review articles bird growth PubMed articles bird growth PubMed Central articles bird growth 2023 articles bird growth 2024 articles bird growth Scopus articles bird growth impact factor journals bird growth Scopus journals bird growth PubMed journals bird growth medical journals bird growth free journals bird growth best journals bird growth top journals bird growth free medical journals bird growth famous journals bird growth Google Scholar indexed journals

Article Details

Introduction

The International Feed Industry Federation (IFIF) announced that the world population maybe increased to more than 10 billion people by the year 2050 [1]. Moreover, it is expected that consumption of animal protein will be doubled for mentioned population [1]. For poultry meat, the expected growth of consumption from 2010 to 2050 is 173% [1]. Dietary sources of protein are one of the essential nutrients in poultry nutrition. These resources, in addition to being an important part of the poultry diet, are also considered the most expensive part of the diet [2]. Oily meal is the most important source among plant protein origin. Currently, the Soybean meal is the most important oily meal that is used in the formulation of diets of broilers and laying hens which is due to the quantity and quality of its protein as well as the appropriate amino acid composition of this meal [3]. However, in Asia, the shortage of availability of soybean meal for livestock and poultry feed is as the result of the significant amount of soybeans consumed as human food and the low soybean production capacity in the tropics due to insufficient agricultural facilities and lack of suitable crops [4]. According to that, the most of the costs in the poultry industry are related to feed, it is important to try to find a suitable alternative to soybean meal [3]. Insects are the third generation of proteins in the world. More than 10 million of insect species have been identified, which account for a half of all creatures in earth [5]. Among of them, approximately 1,500 species of insects are known to be an edible protein source for humans and animals [5]. In between, Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor), is a good food source for small mammals and poultry. Nutritional value of mealworms varies depending on species and developmental stage. These worms are rich in protein, fats, essential aminoacids, and vitamins or minerals [6]. Insects, in general, contain a higher amount in lysine and threonine which is deficient in most commonly used cereal as wheat, rice, cassava and maize but have the lower amount of amino acids, methionine and cysteine [7]. The small size of the worms is ideal for small reptiles and young birds as a dietary supplement [8]. Because these worms feed on bran, barley, soy, are the best food supplements for raising chickens, turkeys, and quails and are the result of bird growth and production of completely natural and quality meat [9-11]. Some authors evaluated the effects of Tenebrio molitory (TM) meal utilization on growth performance, haematochemical profile [10], and carcass traits of broilers, while others focused their researches also on the evaluation of intestinal morphology and histological features in free-range chickens fed diets including TM meal. The economic production parameters of mealworms include their ability to convert organic matter into protein more efficiently compared with their animal counterparts, less space and water needed [12], and the lower environmental impact of insect-based products compared with animal-based products [13], have a nutrient profile similar to fish meat, so they can contribute to more balanced human and animal diets convert often unused and globally abundantly available organic residues, such as straw, food waste, green biomass, faeces, and manure into biomass efficiently commercial production capability [14]. On the other hand, food production systems have a great impact on environmental water changes. We need to produce more food for more people in less places. Research shows that insects can be used as a source of protein for livestock, poultry and even humans. By producing less greenhouse gases, which play a major role in global warming, this important phenomenon can be prevented and the planet's water resources will be better preserved [15].

The aim of this article is to evaluate the effect of partial substitution of soybean meal with mealworm on growth performance and carcass characteristics of Ross broiler chickens.

Materials and Methods

Animal, management, and dietsA total of 240 one day old male chicks (Ross 308) with an initial BW of 41.57 ± 0.4 g were provided from local commercial hatchery (Broiler Breeder of Ghazvin Complex Productive Co., Iran). Chickens were randomly assigned to 5 treatment groups with 4 replications of 12 chicks. Each group was fed for 42 days with isocaloric and iso-nitrogenous diets (Table 1) that were formulated based on standard recommendation. Five dietary treatments used: 1- Control treatment: Basal diet based on corn-soybean meal without adding dried mealworm, 2- Replacement of 5% dried mealworm with soybean meal in the base diet, 3- Replacement of 10% dried mealworm with soybean meal in the base diet, 4- Replacement of 15% dried mealworm with soybean meal in the base diet and 5- Replacement of 20% dried mealworm with soybean meal in the base diet. Nutritional value in 100 g of dry mealworm, amino acids and fatty acids composition is shown in tables 2 and 3, respectively [16]. Birds were provided with known amounts of feed ad libitum. The chicks had free access to water. Birds were maintained at a brooding temperature of 32 0C for 5 day and then the environmental temperature was gradually reduced to 22 0C. During the experiment, light was provided continuously (24 hours). Routine vaccination and health care was given when it was necessary. All animal experiments were approved by the state committee on animal ethics, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran (IACUC no:4687; 4/10/2018). The recommendations of the European Council Directive (2010/63/EU) of September 22, 2010, regarding the standards in the protection of animals used for experimental purposes were also followed.

Experimental group

Control

5% mealworm

10%

15%

20%

mealworm

mealworm

mealworm

 

1-21 d

22-42 d

1-21 d

22-42 d

1-21 d

22-42 d

1-21 d

22-42 d

1-21 d

22-42 d

Ingredients (g/100g as-fed) Corn

66.25

68.73

66.25

68.73

66.25

68.73

66.25

68.73

66.25

68.73

Soybean meal

32.5

30

30.88

28.5

29.25

27

27.62

25.5

26

24

Mealworm

0

0

1.62

1.5

3.25

3

4.88

4.5

6.5

6

Dicalcium phosohate

0.13

0.12

0.11

0.11

0.1

0.09

0.08

0.08

0.07

0.06

Shell

0.16

0.17

0.18

0.18

0.19

0.2

0.21

0.21

0.22

0.23

Lysine

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

Methionine

0.16

0.18

0.16

0.18

0.16

0.18

0.16

0.18

0.16

0.18

Vitamin mineral premix1

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

Na chloride

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

Calculated analysis

                   

Metabolizable energy (MJl/kg)

3000

3100

3000

3100

3000

3100

3000

3100

3000

3100

Available phosphorus, g/kg

5

4.5

5

4.5

5

4.5

5

4.5

5

4.5

Lysine, g/kg

11

10.3

11

10.3

11

10.3

11

10.3

11

10.3

Methionine, g/kg

3.5

3.65

3.5

3.65

3.5

3.65

3.5

3.65

3.5

3.65

Analysed composition (g/kg)

                   

Crude protein (N × 6.25)

220

190

220

190

220

190

220

190

220

190

Calcium

10.2

8.45

10.2

8.45

10.2

8.45

10.2

8.45

10.2

8.45

Fiber

38.2

36.5

38.2

36.5

38.2

36.5

38.2

36.5

38.2

36.5

Notes: Mineral mix supplied/kg diet: Mn, 55 mg; Zn, 50 mg; Fe, 80 mg; Cu, 5 mg; Se, 0.1 mg; I, 0.18 mg. Vitamins mix supplied/kg diet: vitamin A, 18,000 IU; vitamin D3, 4000 IU; vitamin E, 36 mg; vitamin K3, 4 mg; vitamin B12, 0.03 mg; thiamine, 1.8 mg; riboflavin, 13.2 mg; pyridoxine, 6 mg; niacin, 60 mg; calcium pantothenate, 20 mg; folic acid, 2 mg; biotin, 0.2 mg; choline chloride, 500 mg.

Table 1: Ingredients and chemical composition of used diets at (1-21 d and 22-42d).

Ingredients

0 (%)

Moisture

5

Protein

50

Fat

28

Fiber

6

Carbohydrate

1.73

Fe

2.06

Table 2: Nutritional value in 100 g dry mealworm

Item

%

Aspartic acid

3.07

Serine

1.86

Glutamic acid

4.77

Glycine

2.04

Alanine

3.15

Valine

3.14

Isoleucine

1.39

Tyrozine

2.65

Phenylalanine

1.56

Lysine

1.56

Histamine

1.07

Arginine

2.03

Methionine

0.54

Cysteine

0.35

Total

35.67

Fatty acids composition

 

C14

2.85

C15

7.1

C16

9.33

C16:1

2.12

C18

2.4

C18 1n9

40.78

C18 12n6

33.58

C18 3n6

1.85

Total

100

Table 3: Composition of mealworm amino acids and fatty acids

Sample collection and measurements

The chickens in each pen were also weighed at the beginning of the experiment and tried to keep the average of each pen almost close to each other. At the end of each week of the trial, after 2 hours of starving, the chickens were weighed using a digital scale with an accuracy of 0.01 g. Then, the average body weight of a bird was calculated according to the number of birds in each unit. To calculate weight gain at each time point, the difference in body weight at the end and beginning of the period was determined. By dividing the weight by 7, the daily weight gain (DWG) was calculated. Feed intake (FI) was calculated from the difference between feed given during the week and return feed. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated by dividing feed consumption by body weight gain. Two birds from each pen were randomly selected for estimation of carcass characteristics on day 21 and 42 of the trail. Chickens slaughtered by displacing the neck. Abdominal fat, spleen, drumsticks, and breast were separated and weighed; the empty or edible carcass weights were recorded [17]. Also thighs were weighed. Relative weights (RW) were calculated: weight of cut or organ (g) / 100 g of body weight [17]. Broiler digestive enzymes were gradually completed by the end of three weeks. Therefore, to determine the differences of the effect of diet experiment by age 42 days, slaughter was performed at the end of 21 days.

Statistical analysis

Obtained data were subjected to analysis of variance procedures appropriate for a completely randomized design and analyzed by one-way ANOVA using the General Linear Model procedures of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). Mean separation was carried through using Duncan post hoc test. All significance level was set at P < 0.05.

Results

The results of the WG and DWG were shown in the tables 4 and 5. During The first weeks of testing, only the replacement of 10% and 15% of soybean meal with mealworm significantly (P<0.05) improved the WG and DWG gain of the tested chickens and Levels of 5 and 20% replacement did not have a significant effect on the WG and DWG gain (P>0.05). But in the other weeks of testing Replacement of 5% and 20% of soybean meal with mealworm compared to the control diet caused a significant increase in the WG and DWG gain. But compared to the treatments where the replacement level was 10% and 15%, this increase was less. The results showed that replacement of 10% and 15% of soybean meal mealworm compared to control diet, improved (P<0.05) the WG and DWG gain. Due to the price difference between these two protein sources, it can have a significant effect on the cost of the ration. But no significant difference between the two alternative levels of 10% and 15% was observed (P>0.05). The results related to the average FI were shown in the table 6. Results showed that the highest FI numerically was observed in chickens fed with control treatment. Replacement of mealworm with soybean meal in the diet only at the level of 15% significantly decreased daily FI (P<0.05). Other replacement levels, however, numerically reduced FI but the difference with control treatment was not significant (P <0.05). The results related to FCR were shown in the table 7. In the third week of the experiment, the highest FCR numerically was observed in the control treatment but the difference was significant with treatments with replacement of 15 and 10% of mealworm with soybean meal (P <0.05). In the fourth week, control and treatment 4 caused the highest and lowest FCR, respectively, and their differences with other experimental treatments were significant (P <0.05). At the fifth and sixth weeks of the experiment, the control treatment showed the highest FCR and its difference with other experimental treatments was significant (P <0.05). Treatment 4 with a replacement level of 15% also showed the lowest FCR. The difference with other experimental treatments except treatment3 was significant (P <0.05). The results showed that level of replacement of 15% mealworm with soybean meal could improve performance in broilers and reduced the FCR. The results related to Carcass characteristics at 21 and 42 days were shown in the tables 8 and 9. At 21 and 42d, experimental diets had significant effect on carcass yield (P <0.05). Treatments 3 and 4 had higher carcass yields and their differences with other treatments were significant (P <0.05). Between experimental treatments in terms of ratio of thigh weight to live weight was not observed significant difference (P <0.05). The ratio of breast weight to live weight was affected by experimental treatments. Treatments 3 and 4 had higher relative breast weights compared to other treatments and their difference with other treatments was significant (P <0.05). at 21 and 42d the effect of experimental treatments on the relative weight of liver, spleen, heart, pancreas, ventricular adipose tissue and bursa of fabricius was not significant (P <0.05).

Age (d)

1

7

14

21

28

35

42

Experimental diet

Live weight (g)

11

41.20a

102.54b

235.25c

585.60c

868.52c

1303.50c

1902.21c

2

41.35a

103.32b

238.78bc

596.08bc

893.03b

1345.82b

1938.09b

3

42.06a

109.58a

250.08a

607.21a

913.76a

1363.86a

1998.93a

4

41.65a

108.23a

249.68a

610.05a

921.36a

1370.14a

2010.07a

5

42.19a

103.05b

239.43b

597.96b

900.74b

1335.24b

1959.08b

± SEM2

0.02

1.05

2.15

6.45

7.28

12.07

17.09

P-value

NS

0.0001

0.0001

0.0001

0.0001

0.0001

0.0001

1: 1- Control treatment: Basal diet based on corn-soybean meal without adding dried mealworm, 2- Replacement of 5% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet, 3- Replacement of 10% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet, 4- Replacement of 15 dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet and 5- Replacement of 20% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet.2: Mean error standardColumn means with common superscripts do not differ (P > 0.05).

Table 4: Effect of experimental diets on live weight of broiler chickens (g)

Age (d)

1-7

8-14

15-21

22-28

29-35

36-42

Experimental diet

Daily weight gain (g/d)

11

9.78a

19.04b

40.23b

39.34c

58.45c

67.28c

2

9.83a

20.57b

43.02b

41.95b

61.72b

71.94b

3

10.02a

24.02a

46.86a

44.29a

65.34a

75.14a

4

10.08a

23.96a

45.95a

46.88a

66.08a

77.09a

5

9.90a

20.99b

42.94b

41.85b

62.01b

71.61b

± SEM2

0.15

1.27

1.35

1.43

1.56

1.83

P-value

NS

0.0018

0.0001

0.0188

0.024

0.0023

1: 1- Control treatment: Basal diet based on corn-soybean meal without adding dried mealworm, 2- Replacement of 5% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet, 3- Replacement of 10% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet, 4- Replacement of 15 dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet and 5- Replacement of 20% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet.

2: Mean error standard

Column means with common superscripts do not differ (P > .05).

Table 5: Effect of experimental diets on daily weight gain of broiler chickens (g/d)

Age (d)

1-7

8-14

15-21

22-28

29-35

36-42

Experimental diet

Feed intake (g/d)

11

16.28a

52.43a

79.86a

92.02a

122.12a

152.24a

2

16.49a

51.03a

79.06b

90.57ab

120.02a

150.62a

3

16.37a

48.04b

78.53c

89.62b

119.43b

149.32b

4

16.50a

48.97b

78.73c

88.72b

118.97b

148.25b

5

16.31a

51.04a

79.94b

90.79ab

121.71a

149.25a

± SEM2

0.21

0.27

0.31

0.49

0.54

1.31

P-value

0.0001

0.0001

0.0016

0.001

0.0012

0.0001

1: 1- Control treatment: Basal diet based on corn-soybean meal without adding dried mealworm, 2- Replacement of 5% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet, 3- Replacement of 10% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet, 4- Replacement of 15 dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet and 5- Replacement of 20% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet.

2: Mean error standard

Column means with common superscripts do not differ (P > 0.05).

Table 6: Effect of experimental diets on feed intake of broiler chickens (g/d)

Age (d)

1-7

8-14

15-21

22-28

29-35

36-42

Experimental diet

Feed: gain

11

1.75a

1.70a

1.76a

1.97a

2.11a

2.12a

2

1.72a

1.67a

1.72a

1.86b

1.96b

1.97b

3

1.74a

1.69a

1.54b

1.83b

1.86bc

1.92bc

4

1.80a

1.71a

1.50b

1.72c

1.82c

1.79c

5

1.71a

1.68a

1.74a

1.84b

1.87b

1.98b

± SEM2

0.04

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.07

0.07

P-value

NS

NS

0.0001

0.0002

0.003

0.0001

1: 1- Control treatment: Basal diet based on corn-soybean meal without adding dried mealworm, 2- Replacement of 5% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet, 3- Replacement of 10% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet, 4- Replacement of 15 dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet and 5- Replacement of 20% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet.

2: Mean error standard

Column means with common superscripts do not differ (P > 0.05).

Table 7: Effect of experimental diets on feed: gain of broiler chickens.

 

Carcass yeild

Thighs

Breast

Liver

Heart

Spleen

Pancreas

Abdominal fat

Fabricius

Experimental diets

 

11

63.24c

27.14

28.24b

3.12

0.67

0.1

0.25

1.32

0.27

2

65.37b

28.52

28.02b

2.25

0.65

0.11

0.32

1.52

0.26

3

66.53a

29.46

30.12a

3.36

0.63

0.1

0.3

1.13

0.25

4

66.86a

28.03

30.28a

3.16

0.65

0.09

0.29

1.72

0.26

5

64.92b

27.89

28.68b

3.2

0.68

0.08

0.27

1.54

0.23

± SEM2

0.42

0.53

0.76

0.05

0.03

0.04

0.15

0.08

0.03

P value

0.0001

NS

0.0012

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

1: 1- Control treatment: Basal diet based on corn-soybean meal without adding dried mealworm, 2- Replacement of 5% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet, 3- Replacement of 10% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet, 4- Replacement of 15 dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet and 5- Replacement of 20% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet.

2: Mean error standard

Column means with common superscripts do not differ (P > 0.05).

Table 8: Effect of experimental diets on carcass and some organs relative to the body weight of Ross 308 broilers at 21 days of age.

 

Carcass yeild

Thighs

Breast

Liver

Heart

Spleen

Pancreas

Abdominal fat

Fabricius

Experimental diets

 

11

65.03B

30.64

30.43b

4.25

1.05

0.17

0.52

1.13

0.26

2

64.25b

31.86

31.01b

4.19

1.12

0.18

0.57

1.25

0.27

3

68.10a

32.23

33.26a

4.54

1.02

0.16

0.59

1.33

0.25

4

67.67a

31.57

32.67a

4.36

1.06

0.15

0.6

1.28

0.25

5

65.12b

30.53

30.24b

5.86

1.07

0.18

0.56

1.17

0.24

± SEM2

2.26

2.02

1.12

0.31

0.06

0.03

0.05

0.3

0.03

P value

0.0012

NS

0.0001

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

1: 1- Control treatment: Basal diet based on corn-soybean meal without adding dried mealworm, 2- Replacement of 5% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet, 3- Replacement of 10% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet, 4- Replacement of 15 dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet and 5- Replacement of 20% dried mealworm with Soy meal in the base diet.

2: Mean error standard

Column means with common superscripts do not differ (P > 0.05).

Table 9: Effect of experimental diets on carcass and some organs relative to the body weight of Ross 308 broilers at 42 days of age.

Discussion

High amount of protein, fats, amino acids and mineral content were found in T. molitor; consequently, it can easily be used in the poultry ration [18]. The existence of chitin in insects’ meal has the potential to improve poultry health as the result of decreasing populations of intestinal Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp., beside it could increase intestinal Lactobacillus spp. The larvae of a darkling beetle are also rich in fiber and fatty acids; thus, it improves digestion [19]. It can be used as an alternative to antibiotics in the poultry diet when fermented with probiotics. Also, chickens that used mealworm in their diet had softer, and to be juicy meat [20,21]. The results of some researchers also showed the positive effects of the use of mealworm in the diet of broilers. Biasatu et al. [3] used 50, 100 and 150 g / kg of yellow swarm larvae in broiler diets. Results showed that mean body weight and daily body weight gain linearly increased with increasing yellow mealworm in the diet. Ballitoc and Sun and Bovera et al. reported improved growth performance of broilers using levels of 0 to 100 g / kg or 296 g / kg mealworm, respectively. Jane et al. attributed the positive effects of the use of mealworm in the diet to the digestibility of nutrients. They stated that animal protein sources are better accessible than plant sources and their amino acid composition is more balanced. On the other hand, Fink [22,23] reported that the amount of unsaturated fatty acids in mealworm is high and when replacing soybean meal with mealworm, the ability to digest fat is maintained. Therefore, the positive effects of replacing mealworm with soybean meal to 15% can be justified but a lack of significant impact at the 20% level may be related to the presence of certain factors in soy or mealworm which has not been reviewed yet. Some researchers have also reported a lack of significant effect of mealworm on broiler performance [22,24]. The difference between the results of these tests and the results of the present test may be in the form of usage or the amount of mealworm supplementation. In this experiment, replacing 15% of mealworm with soybean meal significantly reduced feed intake (P>0.05). Poultry consume enough feed to meet their needs [25]. According to supplementation of mealworm to the diet of broilers increased the digestibility of nutrients, such as protein and fat and with reference to high amount of energy in mealworm, a smaller amount of this diet, energy and nutrient needs are met and the amount of feed consumption is reduced [25]. The results of several experiments show no effect of supplementation of mealworm in the diet of broilers on carcass characteristics [26-28]. Positive effect of 15% replacement of mealworm with soybean meal on carcass percentage and relative breast weight can be attributed to more energy supply, better digestion of nutrients and higher weight average at this level.

Conclusion

The present research results indicated that substitution of soybean meal in the diet of broilers with mealworm at the level of 15% can improve growth performance and carcass characteristics. It is better to investigate the effect of replacing dried meal worm with soybean meal on blood parameters and the immune system of broilers in other researchers.

Ethics Committee Approval

All animal experiments were approved by the state committee on animal ethics, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran (IACUC no:4687; 4/10/2018). The recommendations of the European Council Directive (2010/63/EU) of September 22, 2010, regarding the standards in the protection of animals used for experimental purposes were also followed.

Peer-review

Externally peer-reviewedAuthor ContributionsConcept-M.R.; Design- M.R., N.N.; Supervision- M.R.; Resources-M.R., N.N.; Materials- M.R.; Data Collection and/or processing- N.N.; Analysis and/or Interpretation- M.R., N.N.; Literature Search-N.N.; Writing Manuscript – N.N., M.R.; Critical Review-M.R.; Other- N.N.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the research council of Islamic Azad University, Birjand and Karaj Branches Islamic Azad University, for financial and technical support of this study.Conflict of interestThe authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.Financial disclosureThis study was funded by Islamic Azad University (grant number: 59-GR-VT-7). The funder declares that have no conflict of interest. The funder provided technical and financial support for this study.

References

  1. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Edible insects - future prospects for food and feed security. FAO Forestry Paper 9 (2013): 171-189.
  2. Ballitoc A, Sun S. Ground yellow mealworms (Tenebrio molitor L.) feed supplementation improves growth performance and carcass yield characteristics in broilers. Open Science Repository Agriculture 19 (2003): 639-652.
  3. Biasato I, Gasco L, Marco MDe, et al. Yellow mealworm larvae (Tenebriomolitor) inclusion in diets for male broiler chickens: effects on growth performance, gut morphology, and histological findings. Journal of Poultry Science 97 (2018): 540-548.
  4. Veldkamp T, Van Duinkerken G, Van Huis A, et al. Insects as a sustainable feed ingredient in pig and poultry diets - a feasibility study. Wageningen UR Livestock Research 21 (2012): 638-648.
  5. Hussain I, Khan S, Sultan A, et al. Meal worm (Tenebrio molitor) as potential alternative source of protein supplementation in broiler. International Journal of Biosciences 10 (2017): 255-262.
  6. Rumpold BA, Schlüter OK. Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. Molecular Nutrition and Food Research 57 (2013): 802-823.
  7. Selaledi L, Mbajiorgu CA, Mabelebele M. The use of yellow mealworm (T. molitor) as alternative source of protein in poultry diets: A review. Tropical Animal Health and Production 52 (2002): 7-16.
  8. Bovera F, Piccolo G, Gasco L, et al. Yellow mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor, L.) as apossible alternative to soybean meal in broiler diets. Journal of British Poultry Science 56 (2015): 569-575.
  9. Loponte R, Nizza S, Bovera F, et al. Growth performance, blood profiles and carcass traits of Barbary partridge (Alectoris barbara) fed two different insect larvae meals (Tenebrio molitor and Hermetia illucens). Journal of Reserch Veterinary Science 115 (2017): 183-188.
  10. Biasato I, Marco MDe, Rotolo L, et al. Effects of dietary Tenebrio molitor meal inclusion in free-range chickens. Journal of Animal Physiology Animal Nutrient 100 (2016): 1104-1112.
  11. Schiavone A, Cullere M, De Marco M, et al. Partial or total replacement of soybean oil by black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) fat in broiler diets: Effect on growth performances, feedchoice, blood traits, carcass characteristics and meat quality. Italian Journal of Animal Scienc 16 (2016): 93-100.
  12. Belluco S, Losasso C, Maggioletti M, et al. Edible insects in a food safety and nutritional perspective: A critical review. Comprehensive Reviews Food Science and Food Safety 12 (2016): 296-313.
  13. Dobermann D, Swift JA, Field LM. Opportunities and hurdles of edible insects for food and feed. Nutrient Bullten 42 (2017): 293-308.
  14. Ramos EJ, González EA, Hernández AR, et al. Use of Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) to recycle organic wastes and as feed for broiler chickens. Journal of Economic Entomology 95 (2002): 214-220.
  15. Springmann M, Mason-D’Croz D, Robinson S, et al. Mitigation potential and global health impacts from emissions pricing of food commodities. Natioal Climate Chang Journal 7 (2017): 69-74.
  16. Jin XH, Heo PS, Hong JS, et al. Supplementation of dried mealworm (Tenebrio molitor larva) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and blood profiles in weaning pigs. Asian Australas Journal of Animal Science 29 (2016): 979-986.
  17. Shabani S, Seidavi A, Asadpour L, et al. Effect of physical form of diet and intensity and duration of feed restriction on the growth performance, blood variables, microbial flora, immunity, and carcass and organ characteristics of broiler chickens. Livestock Science 180 (2015): 150-157.
  18. Aguilar-Miranda ED, López MG, Escamilla-Santana C, et al. Characteristics of maize flour tortilla supplemented with ground Tenebrio molitor larvae. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50 (2002): 192-195.
  19. Siemianowska E, Kosewska A, Aljewicz M, et al. Larvae of mealworm (Tenebrio molitor L.) as European novel food. Agricultural Sciences 4 (2006): 28-37.
  20. Islam MM, Yang CJ. Efficacy of mealworm and super mealworm larvae probiotics as an alternative to antibiotics challenged orally with Salmonella and E. coli infection in broiler chicks. Journal of Poultry Science 96 (2016): 27-34.
  21. Khan S, Khan RU, Alam W, et al. Evaluating the nutritive profile of three insect meals and their effects to replace soya bean in broiler diet. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 102 (2017): e662-e668.
  22. Bovera F, Loponte R, Marono S, et al. Use of Tenebrio molitor larvae meal as protein source in broiler diet: effect on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and carcass and meat traits. Journal of Animal Science 94 (2013): 639-647.
  23. Finke MD. Complete nutrient composition of commercially raised invertebrates used as food for insectivores. Journal of Zoo Biology 21 (2002): 269-285.
  24. Cullere M, Tasoniero G, Giaccone V, et al. Black soldier fly as dietary protein source for broiler quails: apparent digestibility, excreata microbial load, feed choice, performance, carcass and meat traits. The Animal Consortium 10 (2016): 1923-1930.
  25. Hwangbo J, Hong EC. Utilization of house fly maggots, a feed supplement in the production of broiler Journal of Environ and Biology 30 (2009): 609-614.
  26. Nutrient requirements of poultry. Washington (DC): National Academic Press (1994).
  27. Sanchez-Muros MJ, Barroso FG, Manzano-Agugliaro F. Insect meal as renewable source of food for animal feeding: a review. Journal Clean Product 65 (2014): 16-27.
  28. Milagro LT, Gerardo GG, María Castañeda, et al. Early feeding to modify digestive enzyme activity in broiler chickens. Revista MVZ Córdoba 19 (2014): 4316-4327.

Journal Statistics

Impact Factor: * 3.8

CiteScore: 2.9

Acceptance Rate: 11.01%

Time to first decision: 10.4 days

Time from article received to acceptance: 2-3 weeks

Discover More: Recent Articles

Grant Support Articles

© 2016-2024, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved!