Article Information

Lydia Loutzidou¹, Ioannis Mantzoros^1*, Sofia Iosifidou²,  Antonia Aikaterini Bourtzinakou¹, Stefanos Bitsianis¹, Georgios Gemousakakis¹, Anna Gkiouliava³, Dimitrios Kyziridis¹,  Stamatios Aggelopoulos¹

¹4^th Surgical Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, G.Papanikolaou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

²2^nd Surgical Department, G.Papanikolaou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

³Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

^*Corresponding Author: Ioannis Mantzoros, 4^th Surgical Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, G.Papanikolaou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

Received: 13 March 2024; Accepted: 22 March 2024; Published: 20 August 2024

Citation: Lydia Loutzidou, Ioannis Mantzoros, Sofia Iosifidou, Antonia Aikaterini Bourtzinakou, Stefanos Bitsianis, Georgios Gemousakakis, Anna Gkiouliava, Dimitrios Kyziridis, Stamatios Aggelopoulos. RECOSAN Tumors Study: Analysis of Patients with Spine Surgery due to Oncologic Pathology. Journa

Abstract

Keywords

TACE, Chemoembolization, Spheres, Colorectal liver metastases

Article Details

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is the second most common malignancy in Europe [1-3] and the third globally [4] with an estimated mortality of more than 3 million cases by 2040 [5]. Approximately 1 in 3 patients with colorectal cancer will present with hepatic metastases at some point during the disease [4,5]. Surgical resection remains the only definite treatment modality [3,4] but only a small percentage of patients are eligible for it (20-30%) [3,4,6].

For non-surgical candidates with hepatic metastases there are systemic or locoregional treatment options. Systemic alternatives include chemotherapy iv or per os (5FU, irinotecan etc.) and monoclonal antibodies. Locoregional treatment includes liver-targeted therapies, such as Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE), with or without drug eluding beads (DEB-TACE) or degradable starch microspheres (DSM-TACE), local tumor thermal ablation or local radiation [5,6]. The focus of this paper is a comprehensive review of current bibliography concerning patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with DSM-TACE or DEB-TACE (Table 1).

While normal liver tissue is supplied both byportal vein and hepatic artery branches, liver metastases receive their blood supply primarily from hepatic artery branches. Transarterial therapies for hepatic metastases take advantage of this vascular approach. The efficacy of transarterial therapies lies in the targeted local drug administration. The addition of embolic agents results in occluding the tumor feeding vessels. This procedure leads to selective ischemic effect and localized cytotoxicity, thus sparing the remaining healthy tissues [5].

The transarterial administration of drugs and embolic agents is called “transarterial chemoembolization” or “TACE”. Degradable microspheres or drug-eluding beads can be used as embolic agents, thus increasing the chemotherapeutic drug effect while limiting systemic complications. The combination of TACE with these agents is known as “DSM-TACE” or “DEB-TACE” [7].

Selective administration of chemotherapeutic drugs in hepatic artery branches is already used in the setting of hepatocellular carcinoma. This targeted approach is often rendered more effective than systemic chemotherapy with limited adverse effects [7-9]. The use of many different chemotherapeutic drugs has been achieved since then. Among them, adriamycin, mitomycin and commonly irinotecan were transarterially injected to reach the hepatic artery branches that supply the hepatic tumor [10].

The same rationale applies when treating secondary hepatic metastases. The goal is to achieve better tumor response, in terms of reducing or stabilizing tumor volume [11]. Although TACE is not a first line option for metastatic colorectal cancer, it is still used for palliative purposes (after other treatment’s failure) or as a preparation for hepatic resection and further locoregional treatment. According to guidelines, TACE is indicated for patients with a greater than 3-month life expectancy and a good performance status [12].

TACE for colorectal liver metastases is currently being used as DEBIRI-TACE, with irinotecan and microspheres to induce maximum local administration. The advantage of its use versus systemic only chemotherapy is already proven, as far as tumor response rate and tumor downsizing are concerned [13].

Conventional TACE

Transarterial embolization without the use of microspheres is known as “conventional TACE” or “cTACE”. There are several studies on cTACE using different drugs and embolic agents, such as lipiodol [7].

A 2019 retrospective study compared the median overall survival between patients receiving TACE with different drug combinations and lipiodol. The patients in the study had unresectable colorectal liver metastases and were unresponsive to systemic treatment. Raltitrexed- or floxuridine (FUDR)-based TACE was given to patients, in more than one rounds. Overall survival and adverse effects between the two groups were comparable (13 months in the FUDR group vs 14 months in the raltitrexed group, p value= 0.556), leading the authors to conclude that raltritrexed or floxuridine-based TACE is an efficient alternative in patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer [14].

The combination of TACE with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin was already studied in a Chinese study by Shao et al. They found the combination to be feasible and effective, with a 78.9% disease control rate and no unexpected adverse effects, yielding an overall survival of 17.8 months [15].

A study by Yun et al. tested patients undergoing TACE with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil while systematically administrating cetuximab or cetuximab plus capecitabine. The authors reported comparable results between the two groups in terms of overall response and disease control rate. This study included patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer that were expected to survive for more than 3 months [16]. Patients who failed previous systemic chemotherapy might also benefit from TACE. Ren et al. conducted a study with that patient population and had overall survival of 15 months, comparable to other studies’ results. Tumor radiologic downsizing was also demonstrated, at a rate of 52.5% of a total of 53 patients [17]. Although TACE is not considered first-line therapy for colorectal liver metastases, there are studies mentioning TACE as an earlier therapeutic option.  A 2015 meta-analysis with 90 studies addressing hepatic artery therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer found cases where TACE was performed as a first-line treatment. More specifically, median overall survival (OS) was 15,2 months in patients who first received TACE. Patients who failed at least one previous systematic treatment yielded better results with second-line TACE, achieving a median OS of 21.3 months. TACE was found to achieve better survival results compared with the other two treatments studied in the meta-analysis, hepatic artery infusion and radioembolization, if used in the second line setting [18].

In a retrospective analysis by Albert et al, 43% of the patients undergoing TACE had partial response or stable disease. TACE yielded better results if used after systemic chemotherapy. The overall survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer did not exceed the 27-month period. A small minority of the patients of this study were able to proceed to hepatic resection of previously unresectable or recurrent lesions, after the chemoembolization [19].

A recent systematic review for Cochrane Database Library found 1 RCT about TACE in colorectal cancer. TACE was compared to simple transarterial embolization (TAE) with no drugs. The median survival for the TACE group was 10.7 months versus 7.9 months for the TAE group, with no statistical significance between the two outcomes. The lack of conclusive results and the study bias resulted in failure to suggest beneficial outcomes for the TACE group compared with the control group [5].

Spheres and TACE

Drug- eluding beads (DEB) and degradable starch microspheres (DSM) have been used in combination with TACE in the past two decades to achieve better drug concentration and vascular occlusion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [7,20]. The addition of drug- eluding beads in TACE procedures has already proved its efficiency in reducing tumor volume and achieving better survival rates in those patients [21].

The benefit of microspheres lies in their embolic potential and in their ability to release the administered drug in a controlled manner [7,22,23].

The use of microspheres is also efficient in protecting normal liver parenchyma during radioembolization, as shown in the study by Meyer et al. [24]. The rationale behind this lies in the protection of the normal liver by diverting the arterial flow away from the tumor area [24].

In patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer, the combination of TACE with drug- eluding beads containing irinotecan (DEBIRI TACE) is commonly used. Different kinds and sizes of beads can be used for loading with irinotecan or the preferred chemotherapeutic drug [7]. The combination of drug- eluding beads and irinotecan in TACE was first reported in 2006, by Aliberti et al [25].

Several studies have existed since then about the role of DEB-TACE and DSM-TACE in colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Gruber-Rouh et al conducted a single-center 10-year study of the effects of TACE and different chemotherapeutic drugs in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The study included patients with chemorefractory cancer, patients with severe adverse effects from the chemotherapy and patients with initially inoperable hepatic metastases. Both the patient response and the overall survival were measured. TACE was offered with or after systemic chemotherapy as a 2^nd or 3^rd line treatment. Patients treated with TACE had a median survival of 14.3 months, regardless of the chemotherapeutic drug combination (mitomycin C, irinotecan, gemcitabine). Partial response was measured in terms of metastases downsizing, both in size and number. These patients, 36%, were eligible for treatment with a curative intent after TACE, either surgery or ablation [8].

In the systematic review by Karanicolas et al, plentiful data confirm the advantageous use of microspheres in the TACE. Studies revealed better response in the first two-month period (for drug- eluding beads with irinotecan-DEBIRI-DEB-TACE) and similar adverse effects compared to the conventional technique as well as longer survival period for patients with DEB-TACE [3].

Nishiofuku et al conducted a single-center open label trial with 24 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, either with inoperable liver lesions or non-responsive to chemotherapy. All patients received chemotherapy as first-line treatment and then underwent TACE procedures. This study used cisplatin powder in different dosages and degradable starch microspheres. In terms of tumor response (tumor volume decrease) the authors found that a higher cisplatin dosage (80mg) resulted in a 61.1% response versus lower(50mg) cisplatin dosage (0% tumor response). That outcome rendered two patients eligible for further treatment with a curative aim. The overall survival agreed with the results of other studies, at approximately 21 months. The authors concluded that DSM-TACE with cisplatin powder is feasible and has the potential of achieving a high tumor response rate [26].

A 2019 retrospective study of 53 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer examined the feasibility and survival advantage of DEBIRI-TACE. Patients with hepatic metastases and no other treatment option were included. After a total of 125 TACE procedures, it was apparent that the patients who benefited the most were the ones who received previous locoregional treatment (like ablation). The authors demonstrated that bilobar liver disease or extrahepatic disease lead to poorer survival outcomes. Also, patients with previous chemotherapy treatment displayed better results with DEBIRI-TACE compared to chemotherapy- naïve patients. The median survival after the first TACE was 14.5 months in this study [27].

The combination of TACE with multiple concentrations irinotecan beads and the comparison to FOLFIRI treatment in terms of drug concentration and feasibility was studied in a single-center trial by Tanaka et al. Microspheres were loaded with irinotecan in various concentrations and systemic FOLFIRI was administered in nine patients after TACE. This study demonstrated that high doses of irinotecan was tolerable by patients (even at 100mg per mL-microspheres). The concentration of blood SN-38 (irinotecan metabolite) was measured and found to be higher after TACE with irinotecan than intravenous FOLFORI, thus achieving more efficient anti-tumor action. The authors concluded that irinotecan-based TACE, even with high irinotecan dosages, is safe and produces higher drug concentration than systematic FOLFIRI treatment. The median survival of patients was in accordance with literature, at 18.2 months [28].

A 2012 study by Vogl et al included 224 colorectal cancer patients with inoperable or recurrent liver metastases that were treated with DSM-TACE as a preparation for additional locoregional treatment. EmboCept, a degradable starch microsphere, and different chemotherapeutic drugs were administered during TACE. The drugs administered in the TACE procedures were combinations among mitomycin C, irinotecan and gemcitabine and depended on the systemic therapy that patients had already received. Patients that responded to the first TACE procedure (in terms of tumor size downsizing) could be further treated with laser-induced thermotherapy. The median survival after the conclusion of treatment was 23 months [29].

Α 2018 meta-analysis compared the survival and the radiologic tumor response of cTACE, DEB-TACE and radioembolization in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. All the patients included had failed previous systematic or locoregional treatment for hepatic metastases. It appeared that DEB-TACE yielded higher survival benefit than cTACE. This result, however, was not statistically proven and both techniques offered a median survival of 16 months [30].

Guidelines for TACE in metastatic colorectal cancer

The most recent guidelines for the management of metastatic colorectal cancer belong to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO).

The recent guidelines of ASCO state the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach on treating colorectal cancer metastases. Surgical resection remains the only possible curative option. There is no mention of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatic metastases [4]. ESMO guidelines, however, state beneficial results for tumor downsizing using TACE (commonly used as DEBIRI-TACE). Due to lack of solid evidence, it is stated that using transarterial therapies for hepatic metastases as an early therapeutic option should be reserved for patients in clinical trials. For the time being, these treatments are available for individualized setting, for patients with recurrent or unresectable disease, despite the systemic chemotherapy [13].

Conclusion

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer- assosiated death in the world. New cases are estimated about more than one million annually [31]. One quarter of the patients are diagnosed already having metastatic disease and 2-5 out of 10 patients will probably develop a metastatic lesion. Colorectal cancer more commonly metastasizes at liver and lungs. Thus, many therapeutic options have emerged to deal with these lesions. Surgical resection remains the only possible curative option for hepatic metastases, in appropriately selected patients. Multidisciplinary team approach is necessary for treatment decision. Systemic treatment with chemotherapy and local tumor control options can be recommended, both for palliative and disease-stabilization purposes [13]. The administration of different chemotherapeutic drugs in the TACE setting is under study, as is the use of different embolizing particles [32]. The use of TACE in colorectal liver metastases is not universally adopted and should be reserved for individualized cases and clinical trials. Further studies with an appropriate number of patients are needed to reach a consensus [5,7,30].

Acknowledgements

None

Conflict of interest

None

References

1. Vogl TJ, Gruber T, Balzer JO, et al. Repeated transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of liver metastases of colorectal cancer: Prospective study. Radiology 250 (2009): 281-289.
2. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Annals of Oncology 27 2016 (8): 1386-1422.
3. Karanicolas P, Beecroft JR, Cosby R, et al. Regional Therapies for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Systematic Review and Clinical Practice Guideline. Clin Colorectal Cancer 20 (2021): 20-28.
4. Morris VK, Kennedy EB, Baxter NN, et al. Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. Published online 41 (2023): 678-700.
5. Swierz MJ, Storman D, Riemsma RP, et al. Transarterial (chemo)embolisation versus no intervention or placebo for liver metastases. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3 (2020): 498.
6. Walter T, Hawkins NS, Pollock RF, et al. Systematic review and network meta-analyses of third-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 146 (2020): 2575-2587.
7. Vogl TJ, Lahrsow M. The Role of Conventional TACE (cTACE) and DEBIRI-TACE in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 14 (2022): 5603.
8. Gruber-Rouh T, Naguib NNN, Eichler K, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization of unresectable systemic chemotherapy-refractory liver metastases from colorectal cancer: Long-term results over a 10-year period. Int J Cancer 134 (2014): 1225-1231.
9. Nordlinger B, Rougier P. Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: The Turning Point. Journal of Clinical Oncology 20 (2002): 1442-1445.
10. Manjunatha N, Ganduri V, Rajasekaran K, et al. Transarterial Chemoembolization and Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review. Cureus 26 (2022): 56.
11. Clark TWI. Chemoembolization for colorectal liver metastases after FOLFOX failure. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 24 (2013): 66-67.
12. Massmann A, Rodt T, Marquardt S, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for colorectal liver metastases- current status and critical review. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400 (2015): 641-659.
13. Cervantes A, Adam R, Roselló S, et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up ☆. Annals of Oncology 34 (2023): 10-32.
14. Wei N, Zhang B, Wang Y, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization with raltitrexed-based or floxuridine-based chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Clin Transl Oncol 21 (2019): 443-450.
15. Shao G, Liu R, Ding W, et al. Efficacy and safety of raltitrexed-based transarterial chemoembolization for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Anticancer Drugs 29 (2018): 1021-1025.
16. Yun X, Meng H, Zhou A, et al. Efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with capecitabine and cetuximab in the treatment of colorectal cancer with liver metastasis. J BUON 26 (2021): 1002-1008.
17. Ren Y, Chen L, Huang S, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization of unresectable systemic chemotherapy refractory liver metastases: A retrospective single-center analysis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 45 (2020): 2862-2870.
18. Zacharias AJ, Jayakrishnan TT, Rajeev R, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Hepatic Artery Based Therapies for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis. Plos One 10 (2015): e0139940.
19. Albert M, Kiefer MV, Sun W, et al. Chemoembolization of colorectal liver metastases with cisplatin, doxorubicin, mitomycin C, ethiodol, and polyvinyl alcohol. Cancer 117 (2011): 343-352.
20. Iezzi R, Pompili M, Nestola M, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization with degradable starch microspheres (DSM-TACE): an alternative option for advanced HCC patients? Preliminary results. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 20 (2016): 2872-2877.
21. Tang J, Huang Z, Xu J, et al. Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) exhibits superior efficacy and equal tolerance to conventional TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with conventional TACE history. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 46 (2022): 101814.
22. Jarzabek M, Jargiello T, Wolski A, et al. Drug-eluting microspheres transarterial chemoembolization (DEM TACE) in patients with liver metastases. Pilot study. Pol J Radiol 76 (2011): 26-32.
23. Jia G, Van Valkenburgh J, Chen AZ, et al. Recent advances and applications of microspheres and nanoparticles in transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 14 (2022): e1749.
24. Meyer C, Pieper CC, Ezziddin S, et al. Feasibility of temporary protective embolization of normal liver tissue using degradable starch microspheres during radioembolization of liver tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41 (2014): 231-237.
25. Aliberti C, Tilli M, Benea G, et al. Trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) of liver metastases from colorectal cancer using irinotecan-eluting beads: preliminary results. Anticancer Res 26 (2006): 3793-3795.
26. Nishiofuku H, Tanaka T, Matsuoka M, et al. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using cisplatin powder mixed with degradable starch microspheres for colorectal liver metastases after FOLFOX failure: Results of a phase I/II study. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 24 (2013): 56-65.
27. Ngo A, von Stempel C, Corbo B, et al. Transarterial Chemoembolisation of Colorectal Liver Metastases with Irinotecan-Loaded Beads: A Bi-institutional Analysis of 125 Treatments in 53 Patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 42 (2019): 979-990.
28. Tanaka T, Sato T, Nishiofuku H, et al. Selective TACE with irinotecan-loaded 40 μm microspheres and FOLFIRI for colorectal liver metastases: phase I dose escalation pharmacokinetic study. BMC Cancer 19 (2019): 758.
29. Vogl TJ, Jost A, Nour-Eldin NA, et al. Repeated transarterial chemoembolisation using different chemotherapeutic drug combinations followed by MR-guided laser-induced thermotherapy in patients with liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma. Br J Cancer 106 (2012): 1274-1279.
30. Levy J, Zuckerman J, Garfinkle R, et al. Intra-arterial therapies for unresectable and chemorefractory colorectal cancer liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 20 (2018): 905-915.
31. WHO Colorectal Cancer (2023).
32. Fiorentini G, Aliberti C, Mulazzani L, et al. Chemoembolization in Colorectal Liver Metastases: The Rebirth.