Superior Mesentraic Artery Thrombosis - Single Unit Experience During the COVID- 19 Pandemic
Saugata Sammadar, Bageshwar Kumar, Rajender Meena, Gopal Puri, Ankita Singh, Piyush Ranjan*
Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
*Corresponding author: Piyush Ranjan, Associate Professor, Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Received: 29 July 2021; Accepted: 05 August 2021; Published: 17 November 2021
Article Information
Citation: Saugata Sammadar, Bageshwar Kuamr, Rajender Meena, Gopal Puri, Ankita Singh, Piyush Ranjan. Superior mesentraic artery thrombosis- single unit experience during the COVID- 19 Pandemic. Journal of Surgery and Research 4 (2021): 649-655.
View / Download Pdf Share at FacebookAbstract
The Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by novel coronavirus primarily causing infection of lower respiratory tract since December 2019 has been leading cause of mortality and morbidity. With this unpredicted health emergency the number of ischemia related health events has also seen sudden rise, be it cardiovascular disease, stroke, acute limb ischemia and acute thrombo-embolic arterial and venous insult to the gastrointestinal system [1,2]. Acute thrombo-embolic occlusion of the Superior Mesenteric Artery (SMA) is uncommon condition with high mortality rates. High Mortality rate can be attributed to low preoperative diagnostic accuracy and limited timely therapeutic options [3]. The mode of diagnosis has shifted from autopsy to laparotomy and multidetector computer tomography in last couple of decades. Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) leading to transmural intestinal infraction is a condition with extremely high mortality. Despite the considerable advances in the diagnosis and treatment, cause of mesenteric ischemic by enlarge remains elusive. This case series is aimed to provide valuable insight into to presentation ad outcome during COVID.
Keywords
<p>COVID-19, Superior Mesenteric Artery, Mesenteric ischemic</p>
Article Details
Introduction
The Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by novel coronavirus primarily causing infection of lower respiratory tract since December 2019 has been leading cause of mortality and morbidity. With this unpredicted health emergency the number of ischemia related health events has also seen sudden rise, be it cardiovascular disease, stroke, acute limb ischemia and acute thrombo-embolic arterial and venous insult to the gastrointestinal system [1,2]. Acute thrombo-embolic occlusion of the Superior Mesenteric Artery (SMA) is uncommon condition with high mortality rates. High Mortality rate can be attributed tolow preoperative diagnostic accuracy and limited timely therapeutic options [3]. The mode of diagnosis has shifted from autopsy to laparotomy and multidetector computer tomography in last couple of decades. Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) leading to transmural intestinal infraction is a condition with extremely high mortality. Despite the considerable advances in the diagnosis and treatment, cause of mesenteric ischemic by enlarge remains elusive. This case series is aimed to provide valuable insight into to presentation ad outcome during COVID.
1. Methodology
Data of all the patients who were diagnosed with superior mesenteric artery occlusion was collected from retrospectively maintained computes based from 1st March 2020 to 1st March 2021. Data of 10 patients was analyzed with variable including demographics, laboratory blood tests including coagulation panels, medical and surgical history, imaging findings, intraoperative findings, histopathology and postoperatively follow-up period. Patient with mesenteric venous thrombosis were excluded.
2. Case Presentation
This clinical case series describes 10 cases of super mesenteric artery occlusion. The epidemiological and clinical characteristics are mentioned in table 1 and postoperative outcome is mentioned in table 2.
|
Patient |
Age/Gender |
Presenting symptoms |
Imaging findings |
Primary intervention performed |
Intraoperative findings |
|
Case 1 |
63/M |
Pain abdomen, obstipation, nausea and vomiting |
Thrombus present in SMA 6.5 cm from the origin |
EL+ resection gangrenous small and large bowl + jejunostomy + Caecum as DMF |
1000 ml of foul smelling fluid, small bowl 30 cm from Duodenojejunal (DJ) flexure to colon till hepatic flexure gangrenous |
|
Case 2 |
54/F |
Pain abdomen, obstipation, malena, fever, nausea and vomiting |
Thrombus-embolic occlusion in SMA 7 cm from the origin, long segment ischemic changes in distal jejunal and proximal ileal loops. |
EL+ resection gangrenous small and large bowl + end jejunostomy + ileum as DMF |
500 ml of foul smelling fluid, previous anastomotic site seen 30cm from DJ, extensive gangrenous patches seen from anastomotic site till 70 cm proximal to Ileocecal Junction (ICJ) with necrosis of mesentery. |
|
Case 3 |
52/M |
Pain abdomen, obstipation, malena, fever, nausea and vomiting |
Thrombus present in SMA 5 cm from the origin |
EL + PL + diversion loop colostomy + laprostoma |
Gross fecal contamination, entire small and large bowl distended, edematous and congested, loaded with fecal matter. Thickened and viable mesentery. |
|
Case 4 |
50/M |
Pain abdomen, nausea vomiting, abdominal distension |
Possibility of mesenteric ischemia cannot be ruled out |
EL+PL+ resection of small bowl+ end jejunostomy + ileum as DMF |
diffuse fecal contamination, gangrenous patches starting 100 cm from DJ till 10 cm from ICJ |
|
Case 5 |
50/F |
Pain abdomen, abdominal distension, obstipation, nausea and vomiting |
Intra-Aortic thrombus occluding SMA at origin |
EL+ Resection of gangrenous bowl+ end ileostomy+ ileum as DMF |
500 ml of turbid fluid, 70 cm from DJ normal , distal jejunum, ileum, caecum and ascending colon gangrenous, omentum partly gangrenous |
|
Case 6 |
38/M |
Pain abdomen, abdominal distension, obstipation, malena, nausea and vomiting |
Thrombus in SMA extending from origin for approximately length of 3.5 cm |
EL+ Resection of gangrenous small bowl+ end jejunostomy+ ileum as DMF |
300 ml pus in peritoneal cavity, 20 cm distal to DJ to 20 cm proximal to terminal ileum gangrenous |
|
Case 7 |
40/M |
Pain abdomen, nausea, vomiting, obstipation |
Not performed |
EL+ resection of small bowl+ double barrel stoma ileostomy+ feeding jejunostomy |
200 ml foul smelling fluid, gangrenous bowl 70 cm distal to DJ upto 90 cm proximal to ICJ |
|
Case 8 |
50/M |
Pain in abdomen, obstipation, nausea and vomiting |
SMA not visualized |
EL + closure |
No free fluid, SMA pulse not palpable, liver dusky, gangrenous bowl 5 cm distal to DJ flexure to 7 cm proximal to ileocecal junction. |
|
Case 9 |
53/M |
Pain in abdomen, obstipation, nausea and vomiting |
Occlusion at origin of SMA |
Resection of gangrenous bowel and duodeno-colic anastomosis |
gangrenous bowel extending from 5 cm distal to DJ till proximal 1/3 of transverse colon |
|
Case 10 |
42/F |
Pain in abdomen, obstipation, abdominal distension |
Reduced caliber of SMA 5.5 mm from origin. |
EL+ Resection of gangrenous bowl + proximal jejunostomy + ileum as DMF |
Patchy gangrenous bowl 20 cm from DJ to 45 cm proximal to ICJ with omental thickening |
*Exploratory Laparotomy-EL, Distal Mucus Fistula-DMF, Ileocecal Junction-ICJ, Duodenojejunal Junction-DJ
Table 1: Postoperative outcomes of the patients.
|
Patients |
No of reoperations performed |
Outcome on Post Operative Day (POD) |
In hospital Morbidity |
COVID positive by RT-PCR |
|
Case 1 |
0 |
Expired, POD 0 |
Septic shock |
no |
|
Case 2 |
3 |
Discharged, POD 28 |
sepsis, bed sore, stoma site abscess, short bowl syndrome, laprostoma, intrabdominal leak |
no |
|
Case 3 |
1 |
Expired, POD 8 |
Septic shock |
no |
|
Case 4 |
1 |
Expired, POD 23 |
Stoma necrosis, laprostoma, sepsis, short bowl syndrome, dyselectrolytemia, dehydration |
|
|
Case 5 |
2 |
Discharged, POD 73 |
Short bowl syndrome, sepsis, TPN induced liver injury, surgical site infection, burst abdomen, infected mesh laprostoma, stoma retraction, stoma gangrene, dehydration |
yes |
|
Case 6 |
0 |
Discharged, POD 49 |
Sepsis, dehydration, dyselectrolytemia, high output fistula, short bowl syndrome. |
no |
|
Case 7 |
0 |
Expired, POD 1 |
Septic shock |
no |
|
Case 8 |
0 |
Expired, POD 0 |
Septic shock |
no |
|
Case 9 |
0 |
Expired, POD 20 |
Short bowl syndrome, septic shock, dehydration, dyselectrolytemia, |
no |
|
Case 10 |
0 |
Discharged, POD 70 |
Laprostoma, short bowel syndrome, |
yes |
* Reverse Transcription-polymerase chain Reaction- RTPCR
Table 2: Postoperative outcomes of the patients.
4. Discussion
The overall estimated incidence through autopsy verified NOMI with transmural infraction is 2.0/ 100000 persons per year as compared to acute thromboembolic occlusion of the SMA (8.6/100000 person per year) and mesenteric venous thrombosis (1.8/100000 person per year) and increases exponentially with increasing age [4]. SARS-CoV-2 pandemic apart from affecting the pulmonary system and causing respiratory complications also has extra pulmonary manifestation. Abnormal coagulation occurs in many patients with COVID-19 population predispose both to arterial and venous thromboembolic complications [5,6]. In study conducted in New York City area by Yana et al. out of 12,630 patients being hospitalized 49 patients were diagnosed with acute arterial ischemia and 2 patients had SMA thrombosis with bowl ischemia [7]. Our hospital has also encountered unique cases for instance isolated stomach gangrene in a COVID-19 positive patient [8]. So far there have been only 7 cases of COVID-19 related SMA thrombosis reported [9]. The exact pathological mechanism causing the complication of acute mesenteric ischemia and thrombosis in COVID-19 is not known at present. There are few proposed mechanism in isolation or in varying combination which could account for the basis of the complications. Firstly, a coagulation disorder induced by systemic inflammatory state, endothelial activation, hypoxia and immobilization, with preliminary pathological evidence showing bowl necrosis with small vessel thrombosis involving submucosal arterioles, thereby pointing to an in-situ thrombosis of small mesenteric vessels rather than an embolic event. Second, elevated levels of Von Willebrand Factor and expression of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 on the endothelium and enterocytes of small bowl, the target receptor for SARS-CoV-2, may result tropism and direct bowl damage. Lastly, hemodynamic compromise which is associated with COVID-19 pneumonia may lead to NOMI. In this study 9 out of 10 patients had radiologically confirmed thrombo-embolic occlusion of SMA [10].Therefore the exaggeration of thrombosis of preexisting large and medium sized diseased vessel by COVID-19 is another possibility of causing occlusion. Gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with COVID-19 at diagnosis is not uncommon with nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and loss of appetite being the most common symptoms [11]. COVID-19 also have higher rates of abdominal pain as clinical presentation and abnormal liver function test. Most of our patients presented with obstipation and malena also. Comorbidities like ischemic heart disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, stroke, diabetes mellitus, anemia, renal insufficiency, previous vascular surgery and patients on diuretics, digitalis and beta blockers have poor prognosis in general in patients with SMA thrombosis [12]. However none of the patients had any known comorbidities or was on any chronic medication. High resolution Ultrasound examination of abdomen in the early phase may help in identification of SMA occlusion and bowl spasm but in the intermediate phase, ultrasound is not useful because of excess gas in the bowl loops.In later phase it may reveal bowl wall thinning, fluid filled lumen, extra luminal fluid and decreased or absent peristalsis [13]. Computer Tomography (CT) angiography is the best imaging diagnostic modality and has sensitivity and specificity of 89.4 % and 99.5 % respectively [14]. In the patients mentioned above none of them had collaterals suggestive of chronic ischemia or peripheral arterial disease which correlated clinically. There has been a sudden surge in the number of cases in our hospital in current pandemic mostly due to referral bias which and most of them are RT-PCR negative which is in contradiction to our assumption. Though only 2 patient were COVID positive in RT-PCR but several factors are well-known to contribute inconsistency in result of RT-PCR of nasal or throat swab [15]. Treatment for SMA thrombosis is majorly surgical resection of the necrotic bowl, restoration of blood flow to ischemic intestine and supportive measures with hemodynamic support in later stage of presentation [16]. Endovascular intervention has high success rates but was not applicable in the patients mentioned above as they had frank perforation, poor hemodynamic state of the patients andthrombus was not amenable for endovascular treatment [17]. Septic shock with multiorgan failure as reported by other studies was the cause of mortality in the patients and 2 out of 4 patients discharged also expired within 3 months after discharge with cause unknown [18]. The patients tested positive in our series stayed positive for months on repeated testing and didn’t develop any severe pulmonary complication pertaining to COVID per se. Prognosis was also largely driven by the overall physiological condition of the patient at presentation.
3. Conclusion
This series is likely under-presentation of the true incidence of acute SMA thrombo-embolic occlusion in patients with COVID-19, as both asymptomatic cases and moribund patients were likely never diagnosed and influenced by referral bias, withholding elective admission and more emergency admissions in the hospital. In current paradigm shift of understanding the patients with COVID-19 little is known about the acute thromboembolic events. Condition presenting with varied manifestation from asymptomatic to nonsalvagable state and optimal management is not clearly defined with varied postoperative course. Suspicion of COVID-19 in patient with suspected diagnosis of acute SMA throb-embolism and vice versa should be considered.
References
- Mathew T, John SK, Sarma G, et al. COVID-19-related strokes are associated with increased mortality and morbidity: A multicenter comparative study from Bengaluru, South India. Int J Stroke off J Int Stroke Soc 6 (2020): 17-47.
- Harikrishnan S, Mohanan PP, Chopra VK, et al. Cardiological society of India position statement on COVID-19 and heart failure. Indian Heart J 72 (2020): 75-81.
- Acosta S, Ögren M, Sternby NH, et al. Incidence of acute thrombo-embolic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery-a population-based study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 27(2004): 145-150.
- Acosta S, Ogren M, Sternby NH, et al. Fatal nonocclusive mesenteric ischaemia: Population-based incidence and risk factors. J Intern Med 259 (2006): 305-313.
- Oxley TJ, Mocco J, Majidi S, et al. Large-vessel stroke as a presenting feature of covid-19 in the young. N Engl J Med 382 (2020): e60.
- Bellosta R, Luzzani L, Natalini G, et al. Acute limb ischemia in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. J Vasc Surg 72 (2020): 1864-1872.
- Etkin Y, Conway AM, Silpe J, et al. Acute arterial thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 in the New York City Area. Ann Vasc Surg 70 (2021): 290-294.
- Gupta K, Puri G, Jayaram J, et al. A rare case of COVID-19 related stomach gangrene after an abortion: a case report. Int Surg J 8 (2021): 1360-1365.
- Amaravathi U, Balamurugan N, Muthu Pillai V, et al. Superior mesenteric arterial and venous thrombosis in COVID-19. J Emerg Med 60 (2021): e103-e107.
- Parry AH, Wani AH, Yaseen M. Acute Mesenteric Ischemia in Severe Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19): Possible mechanisms and diagnostic pathway. Acad Radiol 27 (2020): 1190.
- Mao R, Qiu Y, He JS, et al. Manifestations and prognosis of gastrointestinal and liver involvement in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 5 (2020): 667-678.
- Acosta S, Wadman M, Syk I, et al. Epidemiology and prognostic factors in acute superior mesenteric artery occlusion. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 14 (2010): 628-635.
- Reginelli A, Genovese E, Cappabianca S, et al. Intestinal Ischemia: US-CT findings correlations. Crit Ultrasound J 5 (2013): S7.
- Henes FO, Pickhardt PJ, Herzyk A, et al. CT angiography in the setting of suspected acute mesenteric ischemia: prevalence of ischemic and alternative diagnoses. Abdom Radiol N Y 42(2017): 1152-1161.
- Tahamtan A, Ardebili A. Real-time RT-PCR in COVID-19 detection: issues affecting the results. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 22 (2020): 1-2.
- Bala M, Kashuk J, Moore EE, et al. Acute mesenteric ischemia: guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery. World J Emerg Surg WJES 12 (2017): 38.
- Acosta S, Sonesson B, Resch T. Endovascular therapeutic approaches for acute superior mesenteric artery occlusion. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32 (2009): 896-905.
- Nagaraja R, Rao P, Kumaran V, et al. Acute Mesenteric Ischaemia-An Indian Perspective. Indian J Surg 77 (2015): 843-849.